Findings from a study published in JAMA Oncology showed no survival difference in fixed duration immune checkpoint inhibitor group vs the indefinite-duration group among patients with non–small cell lung cancer
There was no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were administered fixed-duration immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for 2 years vs patients who received ICI treatment indefinitely, according to results of a retrospective study published in JAMA Oncology.1
After a median follow-up of 14.0 months (range, 0.1-50.9), overall survival was 79% (95% CI, 66%-87%) in the fixed-duration group vs 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%) in the indefinite-duration group. In the fixed- duration group, the hazard ratio for death was 1.26 (95% CI, 0.77-2.08) after unadjusted analysis and 1.33 (95% CI, 0.78-2.25) in the indefinite-duration group. On adjusted analysis, investigators also reported no difference between the patient groups.
In addition, secondary analysis revealed that 11 patients in the fixed-duration cohort subsequently progressed; these patients were rechallenged with ICI after 30 days without treatment. Eight patients received ICI monotherapy and 3 patients received ICI plus chemotherapy. In this rechallenge, the median time from cessation of frontline treatment to the initiation of second-line treatment was 7.4 months (range, 1.8-26.9). After the ICI rechallenge, time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line treatment or death was 8.1 months.
Electronic health records in the Flatiron Health database of 14,406 patients from 280 cancer clinics in the US who started frontline ICI therapy for NSCLC were reviewed 760 days after initiation of therapy.
In 1091 patients who continued treatment at 2 years after exclusion criteria were applied, 113 patients were included in the fixed-duration group and 593 patients were identified as the indefinite-duration group. A total of 13,315 patients had discontinued treatment prior to 2 years.
In the fixed-duration group, the median age was 69 years, 54.9% were female, and 76.1% were White. In the indefinite-duration group, the median age was 69 years, 47.6% were female, and 69.8% were White. More patients in the fixed-duration group vs the indefinite-duration group were likely to have a history of smoking, 99% vs 93%, respectively (P = .01), and were treated at an academic center, 22% vs 11%, respectively (P = .001).
The use of ICI monotherapy was more common in the fixed-duration group vs the indefinite-duration group, 52% vs 46%, respectively (P = .39), and PD-L1 status distribution was similar for both groups. In the fixed-duration group, ECOG performance status of 0, 1, and 2 or greater was 30%, 49.6%, and 12.4%, respectively. In the indefinite-duration treatment group, ECOG performance status of 0, 1, and 2 or greater was 34.4%, 42.8%, and 13.3%, respectively.
Although the use of ICI therapy in NSCLC has had a significant impact on outcomes, the duration of ICI for optimal benefit remains unclear. The researchers noted that key pivotal studies have evaluated the use of frontline immunotherapy for up to 2 years, but in clinical practice, many patients continue therapy beyond that time point. In particular, in KEYNOTE-010 (NCT01905657) and KEYNOTE-024 (NCT02142738), patient survival was 83% and 82%, respectively, 3 years after completing 2 years on pembrolizumab (Keytruda).
Key implications of these findings support treatment discontinuation at 2 years, which is similar to prior studies.2,3 Another implication suggests that patients who received fixed-duration therapy may benefit from rechallenge with ICI, despite progression after ICI treatment is halted. Although this particular finding was identified in a small subcohort, the promising results may lead to further clinical trials.
Kim Evaluates New Regimens for EGFR+ Lung Cancer
January 20th 2025During a Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Medical Oncology Association of Southern California, Edward S. Kim, MD, MBA, discussed the FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA trials of newer regimens for EGFR-positive lung cancer.
Read More
Roundtable Roundup: Lung Cancer Molecular Testing and ALK-Targeted Treatment
January 18th 2025In separate, live virtual events, Vincent K. Lam, MD, and Chul Kim, MD, MPH, discuss molecular assays and treatment options for a patient with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with participants.
Read More
Conservative Management Is on the Rise in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
January 17th 2025In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS, discusses the significance of a 10-year rise in active surveillance and watchful waiting in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Read More
What Is Dark Zone Lymphoma, and Is It Clinically Relevant?
January 16th 2025Dark zone lymphoma includes aggressive B-cell lymphomas with shared molecular features. While some respond to escalated treatment, others remain resistant, highlighting the need for targeted approaches to improve outcomes.
Read More