Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD, discussed the growing use of bispecific antibodies and how he expects to see more of these advances in the coming years.
As we take in the exciting new advances discussed at the recent 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, this column again acknowledges the novel therapeutic agents being developed. Over the years, we have reflected on the excitement of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are now approved for most cancers in various stages. We also celebrated the successes of cellular therapies in solid and liquid tumors. The concept of so-called designer antibody therapies was proposed, and protein engineering launched—based on the rapidly improving understanding of biology and emergence of new therapeutic targets.
These agents are finally being used in clinical practice. There is a whole synthetic engineering strategy to developing an antibody with dual specifi cities, similar to the concept of antibody-drug conjugates. The antibody specificity may attract and colocalize different cell populations or simply take advantage of multiple targets being expressed on the same tumor cell. In some situations, bispecific antibodies may actually be so effective as to replace the more complex cellular production of a chimeric antigen receptor and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy.
Further enhancement of these bispecific antibodies may be to retain effector function of the antibody itself and trigger extrinsic cellular immune stimulation in the tumor microenvironment. Indeed, the specificity variability of the novel antibody molecule may create a local tumor microenvironment that is part of the appeal.
Although some of these protein engineering strategies may have seemed far off, we have seen in the past months beneficial activity with an off-the-shelf advantage over long-production personalized cellular therapy. Because antibody therapies have been broadly used across solid tumors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are so far restricted to lymphoid and blood cancers, the expanse of oncology that may be impacted by these novel bispecific antibodies and their derivatives is truly exciting, and their effect may be transformative.
Emerging from the ASCO meeting and looking toward European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, I expect that we will see more and more of these advances. What an exciting time and motivation for further investment in collaboration between academia and industry, in partnership with patients and governmental investigational mechanisms.
Conservative Management Is on the Rise in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
January 17th 2025In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS, discusses the significance of a 10-year rise in active surveillance and watchful waiting in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Read More
What Is Dark Zone Lymphoma, and Is It Clinically Relevant?
January 16th 2025Dark zone lymphoma includes aggressive B-cell lymphomas with shared molecular features. While some respond to escalated treatment, others remain resistant, highlighting the need for targeted approaches to improve outcomes.
Read More
Controversy Swirls Around the Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors as Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy
January 15th 2025CDK4/6 inhibitors like abemaciclib and ribociclib improve invasive disease-free survival in breast cancer trials, but controversy surrounds study designs, bias, and cost-effectiveness, raising critical questions about their clinical benefit.
Read More