New formulations for current therapies – SC vs. IV
The panelists examine the CheckMate-67T study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
EP: 1.Current treatment options for ccRCC based on patient and disease factors
EP: 2.CheckMate-214: Long-term follow-up data
EP: 3.Review of CheckMate-214: Long-term follow-up in favorable risk subgroup
EP: 4.Review of CLEAR and CheckMate-9ER: Four-Year and 55 Month Follow-Up Data
EP: 5.Review of KEYNOTE-426: Five-year Follow-up Data
EP: 6.Discontinuation or Continuation of IO Therapy – IO/IO vs. IO/TKI Regimens
EP: 7.Treatment-free survival in IO/TKI
EP: 8.Biomarkers: Impact on Treatment Choices and Future Expectations
EP: 9.Management of Adverse Events – IO/IO and IO/TKI
EP: 10.New formulations for current therapies – SC vs. IV
EP: 11.Novel Agents/Combinations for aRCC
- CheckMate-67T compared subcutaneous vs intravenous nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic ccRCC. (George et al. ASCO GU 2024; LBA360.)
- How would the availability of a subcutaneous formulation option improve clinical practice efficiencies?
Enhancing Precision in Immunotherapy: CD8 PET-Avidity in RCC
March 1st 2024In this episode of Emerging Experts, Peter Zang, MD, highlights research on baseline CD8 lymph node avidity with 89-Zr-crefmirlimab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and response to immunotherapy.
Listen
Beyond the First-Line: Economides on Advancing Therapies in RCC
February 1st 2024In our 4th episode of Emerging Experts, Minas P. Economides, MD, unveils the challenges and opportunities for renal cell carcinoma treatment, focusing on the lack of therapies available in the second-line setting.
Listen
