Alan Tan, MD, discusses the 8-year follow-up data from the CheckMate 214 trial of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Alan Tan, MD, assistant professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, discusses the 8-year follow-up data from the CheckMate 214 trial (NCT02231749) of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
The phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial investigated the combination of ipilimumab (Yervoy) plus nivolumab (Opdivo) compared with sunitinib (Sutent). It was the only dual immunotherapy (IO) trial in the front line, compared with 3 other regimens combining IO with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It had 3 primary end points of overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) focused on the patients with intermediate or high risk by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk status.
At 8 years of follow-up, approximately one-third of patients had a durable remission and are mostly not receiving treatment, Tan noted. The trial led to FDA approval only in patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease because of the study design, but over time, the patients with favorable risk also demonstrated an HR of 0.82 favoring IO/IO. Though this is an exploratory post hoc analysis, Tan says that this combination seemed to perform better in the favorable-risk group than IO/TKI combinations in terms of HR.
TRANSCRIPTION:
0:10 | We now have 8-year follow-up from the first IO combination trial of CheckMate 214. It's the only one out of the four main ones that I would say is immunotherapy-only based. So IO/IO is how we like to refer that to, and it's ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Essentially this study had an interesting 3 coprimary end points. It's looking at ORR, PFS, and also OS in the intermediate and poor-risk population. But then they looked at all IMDC in the secondary end points as well.
Essentially, what we've seen over 8 years now is that you have a continued tail of the curve. About a third of the patients in the intention to treat population are still doing well. They're alive and probably mostly off treatment. So we see a durable remission. The FDA approved this combination for intermediate- and poor-risk only. But interestingly, we now see, after 5 years, that the curves are starting to cross over in even [favorable] risk. So you're still seeing an HR of [0.82], which is probably the better HR that that we're seeing, compared [with] the IO/TKI combinations, which actually are either above 1 or close to 1.
Enhancing Precision in Immunotherapy: CD8 PET-Avidity in RCC
March 1st 2024In this episode of Emerging Experts, Peter Zang, MD, highlights research on baseline CD8 lymph node avidity with 89-Zr-crefmirlimab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and response to immunotherapy.
Listen
Survivorship Care Promotes Evidence-Based Approaches for Quality of Life and Beyond
March 21st 2025Frank J. Penedo, PhD, explains the challenges of survivorship care for patients with cancer and how he implements programs to support patients’ emotional, physical, and practical needs.
Read More
Beyond the First-Line: Economides on Advancing Therapies in RCC
February 1st 2024In our 4th episode of Emerging Experts, Minas P. Economides, MD, unveils the challenges and opportunities for renal cell carcinoma treatment, focusing on the lack of therapies available in the second-line setting.
Listen