Safety Data on the Pola-BR Regimen in R/R DLBCL

Video

Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, explains data on the adverse events seen with the pola-BR regimen in R/R DLBCL during the GO29365 clinical trial.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 3:31
Loaded: 4.65%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 3:31
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected

    Case: A 51-Year-Old Woman with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

    Case Description

    A 51-year-old woman presented with fatigue and back pain that worsened in the past 3 months

    History of mild hypertension (controlled with medication)

    Physical exam: Left posterior cervical node, 1.7-cm; left anterior cervical node, 2.9-cm; right supraclavicular node, 2.5-cm

    ECOG PS 0

    CT scan: multiple enlarged mesenteric and retroperitoneal nodes, largest measuring 5.3 x 3.1 cm

    Biopsy confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, IHC positive for:

    CD20

    BCL-6, MUM1

    BCL-2 (50% of cells)

    MYC (>90% of cells)

    Ki67 83%

    FISH: negative for MYC rearrangement/chromosomal abnormality

    Normal CBC and LDH

    Initial Treatment

    Patient received 6 cycles of RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)

    Back pain and fatigue resolved

    Post-treatment PET scan results demonstrated a CR (Deauville score 2)

    Patient was scheduled for follow-up visits at 3-month intervals

    Follow-up Notes/Labs 9 Months After Completion of First-Line Therapy

    Patient complained of increased fatigue and back pain, emergent fever and night sweats

    A palpable lymph node in right groin was discovered on physical examination

    PET and CT scans: new left inguinal lymph node, increase in size of residual node, as well as multiple metabolically active lesions in lymph nodes of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, and pelvis

    Biopsy: DLBCL, non-germinal center B-cell

    Second-Line Treatment

    Patient was referred to transplant center

    Patient received salvage RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide)

    PET-CT scan results after 2 cycles: Deauville score 5

    Third-Line Treatment

    When discussing next steps, the patient declined ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy due to the time commitment and travel required for administration, as well as financial concerns

    The patient received polatuzumab vedotin/bendamustine/rituximab as 3rd-line treatment

    Newsletter

    Stay up to date on practice-changing data in community practice.

    Related Content