Factors for Treatment Decision-Making in R/R DLBCL

Video

Dr Gilles Salles shares his opinion on the presented case’s treatment decision and the regimen he would have selected for the patient.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected

      Case: A 51-Year-Old Woman with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

      Case Description

      A 51-year-old woman presented with fatigue and back pain that worsened in the past 3 months

      History of mild hypertension (controlled with medication)

      Physical exam: Left posterior cervical node, 1.7-cm; left anterior cervical node, 2.9-cm; right supraclavicular node, 2.5-cm

      ECOG PS 0

      CT scan: multiple enlarged mesenteric and retroperitoneal nodes, largest measuring 5.3 x 3.1 cm

      Biopsy confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, IHC positive for:

      CD20

      BCL-6, MUM1

      BCL-2 (50% of cells)

      MYC (>90% of cells)

      Ki67 83%

      FISH: negative for MYC rearrangement/chromosomal abnormality

      Normal CBC and LDH

      Initial Treatment

      Patient received 6 cycles of RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone)

      Back pain and fatigue resolved

      Post-treatment PET scan results demonstrated a CR (Deauville score 2)

      Patient was scheduled for follow-up visits at 3-month intervals

      Follow-up Notes/Labs 9 Months After Completion of First-Line Therapy

      Patient complained of increased fatigue and back pain, emergent fever and night sweats

      A palpable lymph node in right groin was discovered on physical examination

      PET and CT scans: new left inguinal lymph node, increase in size of residual node, as well as multiple metabolically active lesions in lymph nodes of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, and pelvis

      Biopsy: DLBCL, non-germinal center B-cell

      Second-Line Treatment

      Patient was referred to transplant center

      Patient received salvage RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide)

      PET-CT scan results after 2 cycles: Deauville score 5

      Third-Line Treatment

      When discussing next steps, the patient declined ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy due to the time commitment and travel required for administration, as well as financial concerns

      The patient received polatuzumab vedotin/bendamustine/rituximab as 3rd-line treatment

      Newsletter

      Stay up to date on practice-changing data in community practice.

      Related Content