Findings from the MOMENTUM study evaluating momelotinib demonstrated symptom, spleen, and anemia benefits in myelofibrosis compared with danazol in previously treated patients with anemia and intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis.
With the approval of momelotinib (Ojjaara) for patients with myelofibrosis, oncologists and hematologists now have 4 JAK inhibitors for consideration to treat the disease. Determining the appropriate agent and the appropriate timing during the course of the disease to initiate treatment requires expertise and nuance and was the focus of a presentation by John O. Mascarenhas, MD, during the 41st Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium Innovative Cancer Therapy for Tomorrow® conference.1
National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggest stratifying patients by symptom burden and platelet counts.2 In patients whose platelet counts are less than 50 × 109/L, and who are transplant eligible, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only curative approach.
For patients who are transplant ineligible, enrollment in a clinical trial or treatment with pacritinib (Vonjo) are options, according to the guidelines.
In patients whose platelet counts are greater than or equal to 50 × 109/L, if the patient is transplant ineligible, ruxolitinib (Jakafi), fedratinib (Inrebic), pacritinib, and momelotinib (Ojjaara) are JAK inhibitors for consideration, as is enrollment in a clinical trial. If the patient is transplant ineligible and has symptoms of anemia, treatment focuses on managing the myelofibrosis- associated anemia.2
Findings from the MOMENTUM study (NCT04173494)3 evaluating momelotinib demonstrated symptom, spleen, and anemia benefits in myelofibrosis compared with danazol in previously treated patients with anemia and intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis.
A total of 195 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either momelotinib 200 mg and placebo vs danazol 600 mg and placebo. Patients were allowed to enroll in open-label crossover if they had confirmed progression after week 24.
The primary end point was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). Topline findings are presented in the TABLE.3
The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) with momelotinib and danazol were hematological abnormalities: anemia (61% vs 75%) and thrombocytopenia (28% vs 26%). Most frequent non-hematological grade 3 or higher TRAEs were acute kidney injury (3% vs 9%) and pneumonia (2% vs 9%).
“An interesting finding here is that patients who had achieved transfusion independence had durable responses,” Mascarenhas said.
Mascarenhas provided an overview of his myelofibrosis treatment approach, which excluded transplant. In the first line, patients who have a platelet count less than 75 to 100 × 109/L are candidates for pacritinib. Patients with a count of greater than 100 × 109/L should be treated with ruxolitinib or fedratinib, followed by a clinical trial. Patients who are red blood cell transfusion dependent are candidates for momelotinib, followed by a JAK inhibitor and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or luspatercept-aamt (Reblozyl).
In the second line, patients with a platelet count less than 100 × 109/L are candidates for pacritinib. In patients experiencing splenomegaly, fedratinib should be considered; in patients with anemia, momelotinib is the appropriate treatment choice.
In the case of ruxolitinib failure, a JAK inhibitor-based combination therapy should be considered as well. If anemia arises after combination therapy, the clinician can consider an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, immunomodulating drugs, or androgen therapy.
In advanced stages, clinicians can choose from DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors, or BCL2 inhibitors.
“In summary, JAK inhibitors afford patients with spleen, symptom, and cytopenia benefit but do not achieve remission,” Mascarenhas said. “Second-line options after ruxolitinib failure include fedratinib, pacritinib, and now momelotinib. In the future, we will likely see a shift to upfront combination therapy, non JAK2 inhibitor agent sequencing, and increase in survival,” Mascarenhas concluded.
Gholam Contrasts Lenvatinib With Other Options in Child-Pugh B HCC
December 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Pierre Gholam, MD, discussed how post hoc and real-world analyses build upon the limited available trial data for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B status.
Read More
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More