The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors across tumor types in the Veterans Affairs health care system revealed lower real-world survival outcomes than those reported in pivotal clinical trials.
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across tumor types in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system revealed lower real-world survival outcomes than those reported in pivotal clinical trials (PCTs), according to a study evaluating the electronic health records of 11,888 patients.1 The study evaluated ICI outcomes across multiple tumor types in a real-world population in the VA versus historical controls reported in PCTs.
This diverse cohort included older patients, with a mean age at treatment initiation of 69 years and those with comorbidities who would likely be excluded from many ICI trials. In addition, a substantial numbers of African Americans and patients living in rural areas were included, 2 populations that are often underrepresented in PCTs. The majority of patients were treated for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, urothelial cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
The investigators compared factors in the VA population that could affect overall survival (OS) versus sample populations examined in PCTs, which are more carefully controlled with inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Patients who were treated with frontline nivolumab (Opdivo) for melanoma had the longest OS of the study participants (25.5 months). Conversely, patients with urothelial cancer who were treated with second-line ICIs had the worst outcomes (6.7 months). Overall, patients in the VA who received ICIs appeared to have worse survival than those in corresponding PCTs, except for patients treated with frontline nivolumab for melanoma and second-line pembrolizumab (Keytruda) or nivolumab for NSCLC.
When OS results were stratified by frailty status, as defined by the VA frailty index, nonfrail patients had outcomes more closely correlating to those observed in PCTs, and the investigators noted better performance status and a lower degree of comorbidities for these patients. They recommended further research to determine how a factor such as frailty could be used to explain variation in prior non-VA studies of ICI real-world use.
This comprehensive approach to ICI therapy establishes a platform for additional analysis of ICI outcomes and optimization of usage in realworld practice, the investigators concluded.
Reference
La J, Cheng D, Brophy MT, et al. Real-world outcomes for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Veterans Affairs system. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020;4:918-928. doi:10.1200/CCI.20.00084
Gholam Contrasts Lenvatinib With Other Options in Child-Pugh B HCC
December 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Pierre Gholam, MD, discussed how post hoc and real-world analyses build upon the limited available trial data for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B status.
Read More
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More