the tremendous scientific developments in ctDNA, including genetic and epigenetic alterations, which are detectable in the blood—the so-called liquid biopsy—or multicancer early detection tests, represent a revolution that seems to be rapidly emerging on the horizon.
The potential for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in early diagnosis, screening, and prevention can sometimes be overlooked by the oncology community because many of our patients present in our clinics and academic cancer centers with advanced-stage disease. However, the tremendous scientific developments in ctDNA, including genetic and epigenetic alterations, which are detectable in the blood—the so-called liquid biopsy—or multicancer early detection (MCED) tests, represent a revolution that seems to be rapidly emerging on the horizon.
How many times has a patient asked each of us, “Doctor, don’t you have a blood test for my cancer yet?” Recently, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) established some guidance on the MCED blood screening tests, which have begun to proliferate and are available in clinical trials, large health systems, and, shortly, in the commercial marketplace as a reimbursable test.
Many questions remain: Which is the appropriate at-risk population to be screened for the most efficacious application hat is the important algorithm to investigate when a positive test arises to confirm a true positive Conversely, how does one address a false-positive and avoid the cascade of potential costs, complications, and anxiety associated with false-positives or false-negatives?
Given the 33% reduction in cancer mortality since 1991 that was recently announced in the National Cancer Institute’s annual cancer report to the nation, the screening and prevention fi eld loos to these MCE tests as a dramatic new adjunct to assist in detecting early-stage disease, as opposed to later stages, where the oncology community, unfortunately, sees most of its patients.
Separately, the use of ctNA earlier in tumor surveillance, after definitive therapy to detect tumor recurrence or progression and to monitor efficacy and drug resistance, enables previously unimaginable liuid biopsies that are often obtained by a simple blood draw. Monitoring resistant genomic alterations or, in the case of virus-induced cancers, the recidivistic tumor regrowth after therapy, might permit implementation of more targeted, effective therapies sooner.
Thus, with strong support and advocacy, funding from the NCI, investments from commercial entities in the science and the validation of these tests, and further developments in clinical utility, the early-diagnosis fi eld should accelerate in 2023 and beyond. These much more durable cases that also are easier and less expensive to treat and cure, with higher quality of life and less morbidity, provide a sweet spot, warranting our attention and our participation.
Gholam Contrasts Lenvatinib With Other Options in Child-Pugh B HCC
December 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Pierre Gholam, MD, discussed how post hoc and real-world analyses build upon the limited available trial data for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B status.
Read More
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More