In the second part of a 2-article series, Matthew Matasar, MD, MS, discusses long-term follow up data from the LOTIS-2 trial and how these data show the durability and tolerability of loncastuximab for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
CASE
Targeted Oncology: How has data from the LOTIS-2 trial (NCT03589469) impacted your long-term outlook on the use of loncastuximab for patients with DLBCL?
MATTHEW MATASAR, MD, MS: When getting a closer look at the durability [of loncastuximab], the results aren't a surprise.1 This is a theme in [treating patients with] large cell lymphoma, where the quality of responses does indeed drive outcomes in treatment with this antibody-drug conjugate. While there's relatively few patients who are being followed [after having a complete response], we see that those patients can enjoy what appears to be a quite durable response, [even as patients with partial response have a median duration of response of 5.68 months (95% CI, 1.64-9.26)].1 As these data continue to mature, we look forward to future updates to see how these patients [receiving loncastuximab] perform over time.
What other efficacy data from LOTIS-2 are important to note?
When you look at the subgroup analysis [from LOTIS-2], you're trying to get a sense for whether there are there patients who derive incremental benefit from treatment with loncastuximab. Indeed, this is a drug that we think has good activity even in the highest-risk subset of patients. There are few data for any of these treatments for patients with relapsed double-hit lymphoma in the third-line setting, but there were responses even for the patients with double- or triple-hit lymphoma. [In this trial], 5 out of 15 patients did respond to loncastuximab, while some patients with early refractory disease also seemed to do well.2
The response rate and activity was similar for those [patients] post chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapy or who didn't have it, and the number of prior lines of therapy, which usually is the most predictive factor for response to a next line of therapy, did not predict response to loncastuximab [in this study].2 The theme that I would draw from here...is that this drug is active even in the patients with highest risk.
What was the safety profile for this therapy for the relapsed/refractory DLBCL population?
Loncastuximab does have some toxicities of note, including some cytopenias. There was also asymptomatic gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT] elevation, which was limiting in the context of a clinical trial.3 I do not routinely check for GGT when I'm giving loncastuximab in practice, and I'm not sure I would encourage other people to check it either. A toxicity that I do want to call attention to is peripheral edema.
[This is because], for reasons that aren't entirely clear, this therapy’s payload is associated with fluid accumulation that can be peripheral edema, or it could even be pleural effusions.3 So being sensitive to your patient's weight, monitoring them for fluid accumulation, and intervening early with diuretics, should they develop edema or effusions early in the course [of treatment], is important when helping them avoid worsening of that toxicity. In terms of the overall tolerability [of loncastuximab], there were several treatment-emergent adverse events but few of these led to treatment discontinuation—fewer than 20%. GGT elevation was a major [reason for treatment discontinuation], and non-GGT toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation was thankfully [not as high].3
References:
1. Caimi PF, Ai WZ, Alderuccio JP, et al. Duration of response to loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by demographic and clinical characteristics: Subgroup analyses from LOTIS 2. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):7546. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.7546
2. Caimi PF, Ai WZ, Alderuccio JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine (ADCT-402) in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2020;136(suppl 1):35-37. doi:10.1182/blood-2020-137524
3. Zinzani PL, Caimi PF, Carlo-Stella C, et al. LOTIS 2 follow-up analysis: updated results from a phase 2 study of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2021;39(S2):252-254. doi:10.1002/hon.89_2880
Therapy Type and Site of Metastases Factor into HR+, HER2+ mBC Treatment
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ian Krop, MD, and participants discussed considerations affecting first- and second-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Examining the Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Paradigm
July 15th 2022In season 3, episode 6 of Targeted Talks, Yazan Samhouri, MD, discusses the exciting new agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the clinical trials that support their use, and hopes for the future of treatment.
Listen
Supportive Care Helps Manage AEs With Teclistamab in R/R Multiple Myeloma
December 13th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Hana Safah, MD, discussed updated data and adverse event management related to teclistamab in patients with multiple myeloma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Zilovertamab Vedotin/R-CHP Elicits High Complete Response Rate in DLBCL
Published: December 8th 2024 | Updated: December 8th 2024The addition of zilovertamab vedotin to R-CHP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, rituximab) resulted in a 100% complete response rate in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.
Read More