The efficacy and data for the combination of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma show effective outcomes for patients that clinicians can use when discussing treatment options.
During a live virtual event with other physicians, Bijal Shah, MD, MS, reviewed the efficacy and data for the combination of polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy) plus bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab (Rituxan; pola-BR) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Shah discussed what made this combination effective, but also which adverse events to look out for.
Which data show the most promising efficacy results for pola-BR?
Recently, data have come from a phase 2 trial that evaluated pola-BR [for treatment of R/R DLBCL and R/R follicular lymphoma]. The trial enrolled patients with 1 or more prior lines of therapy, which reflects how R/R is defined in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.1 Patients were required to have an ECOG score of 0 to 2 and no significant peripheral neuropathy, [which can be exacerbated by] polatuzumab. Patients also had to be transplant ineligible.2,3
Transplant ineligibility is a common requirement for patients in R/R DLBCL trials, but in practice I often find this difficult to define. Patients with a prior allogeneic transplant, a recent autologous transplant, or a history of transformation from indolent disease [also were excluded from] this study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive pola-BR or BR only; randomization was conducted within strata of R/R DLBCL and R/R follicular lymphoma.
The distribution of patients by disease type was good [n = 40 in each disease group]. Some patients had up to 7 prior lines [of therapy], but approximately half of patients had 2 [or fewer] prior lines. About 25% of patients had a prior transplant, and 37.5% of patients had GCB disease.
What was the response to pola-BR in this setting?
Response rates to pola-BR were like what we saw with lenalidomide/tafasitamab: the ORR in the pola-BR arm was 45%, with the majority being CRs [40%].3 Among patients who received BR alone, the ORR was 20%, including a CR rate of 17.5%.
PFS, based on the [analysis done by the] independent review committee, was 9.5 months in the pola-BR arm [compared with 3.7 months in the] BR-only arm. OS was 12.4 months in the pola-BR group compared with 4.7 months in the BR group. What [was not evaluated in this trial] is the effect of polatuzumab plus rituximab.
If we know that bendamustine is not adding much—at least BR did not show much [of an effect in this trial]—then it is unclear whether we need to include bendamustine as a component of this regimen. We often ask ourselves this question for our patients at Moffitt [Cancer Center].
What adverse events (AEs) were associated with pola-BR?
Adverse events [AEs] associated with pola-BR included, not surprisingly, cytopenias. [Grade 3 or 4] thrombocytopenia occurred in 41% of patients, and neutropenia in approximately 46% of patients. What may [be surprising] is that in the BR-only arm, 33% of patients developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and [23% of patients developed grade 3 or 4] thrombocytopenia.
Polatuzumab is certainly driving some of the thrombocytopenia. Lymphopenia [did not occur in the] BR arm, and the absence of lymphopenia is something I see in almost all the patients I’ve treated with BR, [including those with] mantle cell lymphoma and DLBCL.
Febrile neutropenia was not very common in either arm of the cohort. High-grade nausea, strangely, was not seen in the pola-BR or the BR arms, which contrasts with what was seen in the BRIGHT study [NCT00877006].4 In the pola-BR study, fatigue, decreased appetite, and peripheral neuropathy were common, [occurring in 35.9%, 25.6%, and 43.6% of patients, respectively]. Interestingly, high-grade neuropathy was not seen.3
REFRENCES
1. NCCN. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. B-cell lymphomas, version 4.2021. Accessed June 6, 2021. https://bit.ly/3geoS5N
2. Sehn LH, Kamdar M, Herrera AF. Randomized phase 2 trial of polatuzumab vedotin (pola) with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL and DLBCL. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl 15):7507. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.7507
3. Sehn LH, Herrera AF, Flowers CR, et al. Polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(2):155-165. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.00172
4. Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl BS, et al. Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood. 2014;123(19):2944-2952. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-11-531327
Therapy Type and Site of Metastases Factor into HR+, HER2+ mBC Treatment
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ian Krop, MD, and participants discussed considerations affecting first- and second-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Supportive Care Helps Manage AEs With Teclistamab in R/R Multiple Myeloma
December 13th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Hana Safah, MD, discussed updated data and adverse event management related to teclistamab in patients with multiple myeloma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Zilovertamab Vedotin/R-CHP Elicits High Complete Response Rate in DLBCL
Published: December 8th 2024 | Updated: December 8th 2024The addition of zilovertamab vedotin to R-CHP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, rituximab) resulted in a 100% complete response rate in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.
Read More