A recent phase 1/2 study revealed promising results, with an estimated 4-month intracranial progression-free survival rate of 70.7% with stereotactic radiosurgery with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab.
Pairing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with the combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) proved to be a safe and potentially effective approach for treating brain metastases in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a recent phase 1/2 study (NCT02696993).1
The study revealed promising results, with an estimated 4-month intracranial progression-free survival rate of 70.7%.
The safety cohort (phase 1) of this non-randomized, open-label trial was designed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of coinciding radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Prior to this study, retrospective data on safety were limited regarding immunotherapy with intracranial radiation, and for patients recently diagnosed with brain metastasis.1
The median follow-up was 2 months (range, 9.7-24.) with a median interval of days between systemic therapy and radiation therapy.1 Within the phase 1 trial involving 13 enrolled patients, a subset of participants discontinued their participation before the 8-week assessment. The reasons for discontinuation varied: for 1 patient the cancer spread to the brain, requiring whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT); another experienced disease progression outside the brain; and a third patient died due to sepsis which was unrelated to the study treatment.
The median follow-up time from initiation of the study was 9.7 months, (range, 1.2-25.8). Most patients were women (62%, n = 8), and the median age was 6 years, (range, 47-81). All participants had a history of smoking, and patients (23%) were current smolers. Among the 13 patients, 10 (77%) had an ECOG performance status score of 0. All patients exhibited progressive extracranial disease. No patients displayed activating EGFR mutations or ALK or ROS1 translocations. A detailed analysis of PD-L1 expression revealed 46% (n = 6) of patients with tumors having minimal (less than 1%) PD-L1 expression, 15% (n = 2) with 1% to 49%, 31% (n = 4) with greater or equal to 50%, and 1 patient with an unknown tumor -1 status due to inadequate tissue for testing.1
Of the 13 patients, 92% eperienced adverse events (AEs) related to the study grade 1 (56.8%), grade 2 (18.2%), grade (1%), and grade 4 (2%). most common grade AEs (15%) were elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. The primary grade 4 (15%) identified was cerebral edema, which included 1 instance as an intracranial DLT.
In the 10 patients whose progress was evaluated, no cases of serious AEs were identified beyond the brain. One patient experienced a grade 5 AE which was hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome. Treatment discontinuations resulted from AEs such as grade adrenal insufficiency, grade 4 cerebral edema, and grade 2 lower limb muscle weakness.
As of August 1, 2020, 6 of the 13 patients died, and the median overall survival was not reached.1 Investigators report that concurrent use of ipilimumab plus nivolumab with SRS for brain metastases from NSCLC is attainable and meets the end point for safety1 based on the following events only 1 patient experienced the intracranial DLT grade 4 event, allowing the continuation to phase 2, as the predetermined stopping criteria was not met; 31% of patients had grade 3 AEs connected to the treatment, respectively and only 15% of patients experienced grade 4 cerebral edema, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Going forward, these findings shed light on the spectrum of AEs associated with this regimen.1 Although the results with this combination treatment have been determined as safe, caution should be used when interpreting due to the increased use of SRS in patients with multiple brain metastases.1 Further study is required to evaluate intracranial activity, as well as the safety with using this treatment simultaneously with WBRT.
Kim Evaluates New Regimens for EGFR+ Lung Cancer
January 20th 2025During a Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Medical Oncology Association of Southern California, Edward S. Kim, MD, MBA, discussed the FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA trials of newer regimens for EGFR-positive lung cancer.
Read More
Roundtable Roundup: Lung Cancer Molecular Testing and ALK-Targeted Treatment
January 18th 2025In separate, live virtual events, Vincent K. Lam, MD, and Chul Kim, MD, MPH, discuss molecular assays and treatment options for a patient with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with participants.
Read More
Conservative Management Is on the Rise in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
January 17th 2025In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS, discusses the significance of a 10-year rise in active surveillance and watchful waiting in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Read More
What Is Dark Zone Lymphoma, and Is It Clinically Relevant?
January 16th 2025Dark zone lymphoma includes aggressive B-cell lymphomas with shared molecular features. While some respond to escalated treatment, others remain resistant, highlighting the need for targeted approaches to improve outcomes.
Read More