Liquid biopsy is offering a noninvasive, real-time, and personalized approach to tumor assessment, and is already revolutionizing the field of clinical oncology.
One of the most significant challenges in treating patients with brain cancer–and indeed in some other cancers, as well–remains the ability to determine whether cancer has progressed or returned. With treatment necrosis, pseudoprogression, and brain tumor recurrence sharing a similar appearance on conventional follow-up imaging, as well as a patient population that is often unable to undergo additional surgical biopsy without great risk, the search for new options to help differentiate the possibilities is underway. Fortunately, with further study and refinement of liquid biopsy technology, an emerging technology across cancer settings, we now find ourselves in the midst of a transformative change in the landscape of cancer care.
Liquid biopsy tests, which measure circulating tumor in a patient's blood, have already been applied to several different cancer types and have spawned a thriving research community.1 They not only offer a minimally invasive alternative to traditional biopsy, but they also provide enhanced detection and continuous monitoring of cancer.2
Advances in the sequencing of the human genome have made it possible to perform molecular diagnostic testing using a simple blood test. Since the FDA's approval in 2016 of the first liuid biopsy test, research has rapidly moved forward.3 In 2019, liuid biopsy tests were developed as an early detection test for multiple cancer types, and in 2020, they were used to detect cancer mutations in microscopic fragments of DNA or RNA in a patient's blood.3,4
A year later, the approved a liquid biopsy test for monitoring patients with cancer.5 In 2022, with the rapid evolution of methods that allowed for improved isolation and analysis of liquid biopsies, greater detail about tumor characteristics, such as tumor progression, tumor stain, heterogeneity, gene mutations, and clonal evolution, became possible.2
With the progression of research, we have been able to further define the advantages for patients and care teams. In addition to their noninvasive nature, liquid biopsy benefits include the following:
Additional research is needed to optimize the technique and validate its clinical utility, a point made by the Response Assessment in Neuro- Oncology group's international task force that was charged with reviewing the literature on liquid biopsy use in gliomas. Our report concluded that liquid biopsy is a promising tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of gliomas, and that standardization in biofluid collection and choice of an analyte, as well as other strategies, must be uniform.8
In addition, the field of liquid biopsy in brain tumors is evolving and research is expanding its potential applications. There are several clinical liuid biopsy trials currently underway. The Miami Cancer Institute is one of the sites offering the prospective IRT trial (NCT05383872). The ongoing study, which is currently enrolling patients, aims to illustrate the clinical use of liquid biopsy enhanced by low-intensity focused ultrasound technology in patients with brain cancer and provide valuable insights into the clinical utility of the approach.9
A vital component of the research is collaboration between oncologists, radiation oncologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons. Because such research involves a range of technical and clinical expertise, such collaboration helps ensure that all aspects of the research are covered and that the results are clinically relevant, accurate, and applicable to patient care.10 There are some selected ongoing liquid biopsy studies that include the following
Good candidates for liquid biopsy include patients who cannot undergo traditional tissue biopsy, those with metastatic cancer, patients requiring continuous monitoring, and those whose tumors are in challenging locations where traditional biopsies may be difficult or risky to perform. Liquid biopsy is offering a noninvasive, real-time, and personalized approach to tumor assessment, and is already revolutionizing the field of clinical oncology. It is our hope that continued research will give this new technology a solid place in our toolbox for the fight against cancer.
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More