RMC-6236 was safe and tolerable in patients with mutant solid tumors harboring KRAS G12X mutations across various cancer types.
The investigational oral treatment RMC-6236 appeared safe and tolerable, alongside a reduction in tumor growth for patients with mutant solid tumors harboring KRAS G12X mutations across various cancer types. Investigators conducted a phase 1/1b multicenter open-label study trial (NCT05379985) to assess the dosage, safety, and efficacy of RMC-6236, according to an American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) news release.1,2
“Overall, 27 of 54 patients (50%) were evaluable for change in mutant KRAS VAF on treatment. RMC-6236 demonstrated a well-tolerated safety profile across dose levels and in patients with diverse tumor types. The treatment also demonstrated dose-dependent pharmacokinetics compatible with once-daily dosing and achieved exposures predicted to induce tumor regressions, Alexander Spira MD, PhD, FACP, said in a presentation at the 2023 AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics.3 Spira is a clinical assistant professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland; and a medical oncologist and codirector of the Thoracic and Phase I Program at Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute in Fairfax.
The total study population of 131 patients received RMC-6236 at increasing dose levels of 10 to 220 mg once per day beginning on May 11, 2023. The median age was 64 years (range, 30-86) and the patient population was mostly men (53%). Patients had advanced KRAS G12X mutant solid tumors in various cancer types: pancreatic cancer (n = 26; 48%), non–small cell lung cancer (n = 13; 24%), and colorectal cancer (n = 10; 19%).2
The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash (acneiform [35%] or maculopapular [13%]) and gastrointestinal- related toxicities (nausea [32%], diarrhea [19%], vomiting [15%]) and were grade 1 or 2 in severity. These TRAEs occurred in 10% of patients and rash frequency, excluding severity, was proportional to the dose. One patient reduced their dose because of grade 2 acneiform rash.
The emergence of an acneiform or maculopapular rash aligns with the intended effect of RAS pathway inhibitors. This rash typically manifested in cycle 1 or 2 and was predominantly of grade 1 or 2 intensity. Supportive measures included the use of topical antibiotics, topical steroids, and/or oral antibiotics.3
Among patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 had grade 3 pancreatitis and 1 developed a perforation in the large intestine where the tumor was situated, necessitating dose discontinuation. Nonetheless, the tumor did exhibit a reduction in size following treatment.
Twenty-three patients (43%) discontinued treatment for various reasons. Among them, 17 patients (31%) did so due to progressive disease per RECIST v1.1, 2 clinical progression, 1 had a perforated large intestine (previously mentioned), 1 was removed based on investigators’ decision, 1 died, and 1 patient withdrew from the trial.1
To address the need for treatments that target KRAS mutations beyond G12C, RMC-6236 targets the active form of RAS proteins, not just KRAS G12C, leading to potentially deeper and more lasting regression of tumors. RMC-6236 has the potential to be effective against a wider range of cancer types due to its ability to target various RAS mutations as well as target wild-type KRAS (the nonmutated form) and KRAS with mutations at other positions.1
RMC-6236 exhibited dose-dependent increases in exposure without any notable accumulation in the blood after repeated daily dosing and at a dose of 220 mg given once daily. Furthermore, promising early indications of antitumor activity, including partial responses as per RECIST v1.1 criteria, were noted across various tumor types and dosage levels. Additionally, molecular responses were observed, characterized by a reduction in circulating tumor DNA associated with the KRAS-mutated allele and other somatic mutations, aligning with the anticipated inhibition of mutant RAS by RMC-6236, which allows for the treatment of a range of tumors.1
The oral administration of RMC-6236 demonstrates favorable pharmacokinetics and overall tolerability particularly at doses that lead to tumor reduction, according to the news release. However, dose escalation is ongoing and the optimal dosage for the next phase of clinical trials remains to be determined.1
“There are a lot of people who did not think you could do a RAS (ON) inhibitor, surmising it would be too toxic because you are turning off normal RAS. We found out that you can, and be okay, which was very surprising. More steps need to be taken going forward, but we might be able to target a lot of different mutations right now, which is a first. The key takeaways are that we can do this, it’s active, and we're very excited,” Spira told Targeted Therapies in Oncology in an interview.
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More