Fianlimab plus cemiplimab was well-tolerated and showed durable responses, in pretreated patients with advanced clear cell renal carcinoma.
The combination of fianlimab and cemiplimab-rwlc (Libtayo) generated well-tolerated and durable responses, according to findings from a phase 1 trial (NCT03005782) that evaluated pretreated patients with advanced clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). Results were presented at the 2024 Kidney Cancer Research Summit in July.
Study results showed that patients in cohort 3, which included those who received prior treatment with a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) but were naive to an anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (n = 15), achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 20% (95% CI, 4%-48%). All responders had a partial response (PR), and the rates of stable disease (SD) and progressive disease were 60% and 20%, respectively, translating to a disease control rate (DCR) of 80% (95% CI, 52%-96%).
Among patients in cohort 4 who had prior exposure to both a VEGF TKI and an anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agent (n = 15), fianlimab plus cemiplimab elicited an ORR of 7% (95% CI, 0%-32%), with 1 patient achieving a PR. The respective SD and progressive disease rates were 67% and 27%, and the DCR was 73% (95% CI, 45%-92%).
“These data support the development of fianlimab plus cemiplimab combination therapy for patients with metastatic ccRCC,” lead study author Miso Kim, MD, PhD, MS, of Seoul National University Hospital in South Korea, said in a presentation of the data.
The open-label, cohort expansion study included adults with locally advanced or metastatic ccRCC who had received no more than 2 previous regimens of antiangiogenic therapy. Cohort 3 included patients naive to prior treatment with an anti–PD-1/ PD-L1 agent, and cohort 4 included patients who received prior treatment with an anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agent within 3 months of screening. Key inclusion criteria for all patients included an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 criteria, and adequate bone marrow and organ function.
Patients were excluded if they received prior treatment with a LAG-3–targeted therapy or had undergone radiation treatment within 2 weeks of enrollment.
In both cohorts 3 and 4, all patients received 1600 mg of fianlimab plus 350 mg of cemiplimab once every 3 weeks for up to 24 months.
ORR per RECIST v1.1 criteria served as the trial’s primary end point. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, duration of response, DCR, and safety.
In cohort 3, the median age was 64 years (range, 60-68), 80% of patients were male, and 40% of patients were White. Eighty percent of patients had a hemoglobin level below the lower limit of normal (LLN), 20% of patients had a calcium level greater than 10 mg/DL, and 13% of patients had a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Twenty-seven percent of patients went from diagnosis to systemic treatment in less than 1 year. All patients in cohort 3 had an ECOG PS of 1. The numbers of prior lines of therapy included 1 (40%), 2 (40%), and 3 (20%).
Patients in cohort 4 had a median age of 64 years (range, 57-74). Eighty-seven percent of patients were male, and 87% were White. Hemoglobin levels below the LLN were observed in 33% of patients at baseline, 27% of patients had a calcium level greater than 10 mg/DL, and 7% of patients had an LDH level more than 1.5 times the ULN. Forty percent of patients proceeded from diagnosis systemic therapy in less than 1 year. Sixty-seven percent of patients in cohort 4 had an ECOG PS of 0. The numbers of prior lines of therapy included 1 (7%), 2 (67%), 3 (20%), and 5 (7%). Kim noted that most patients in both cohorts had high-risk features.
Regarding safety, 3 patients in cohort 3 discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs), which were grade 3 pancreatitis; grade 3 colitis; and grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. One patient in cohort 4 discontinued treatment due to grade 3 pneumonia. Notably, 1 patient in cohort 3 died due to a treatment-emergent AE (TEAE).
In cohort 3, TEAEs of any grade occurred in all patients, and 53% of patients had grade 3 or higher TEAEs. The rates of any grade and grade 3 or higher serious TEAEs were 33% and 27%, respectively. The respective rates of any-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were 80% and 27%. Serious TRAEs of any grade and grade 3 or higher were reported in 20% and 13% of patients, respectively. Immune-related TEAEs of any grade occurred in 40% of patients, and 13% of patients had grade 3 or higher immune-related TEAEs.
The most common TRAEs reported in at least 10% of patients in cohort 3 included rash (any grade, 27%; grade ≥ 3, 0%), pruritus (13%; 0%, respectively), and colitis (13%; 7%).
In cohort 4, TEAEs of any grade occurred in 93% of patients, and 27% of patients had grade 3 or higher TEAEs. The rates of anygrade and grade 3 or higher serious TEAEs were both 13%. The rate of any-grade TRAEs was 60%, and no patients had grade 3 or higher TRAEs. Serious TRAEs of any grade occurred in 7% of patients, and none were grade 3 or higher. Immune-related TEAEs of any grade occurred in 7% of patients, and none were grade 3 or higher.
The most common any-grade TRAEs in cohort 4 included rash (7%), maculopapular rash (13%), diarrhea (13%), fatigue (20%), infusion-related reaction (7%), and decreased appetite (7%).
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Enhancing Precision in Immunotherapy: CD8 PET-Avidity in RCC
March 1st 2024In this episode of Emerging Experts, Peter Zang, MD, highlights research on baseline CD8 lymph node avidity with 89-Zr-crefmirlimab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and response to immunotherapy.
Listen
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Beyond the First-Line: Economides on Advancing Therapies in RCC
February 1st 2024In our 4th episode of Emerging Experts, Minas P. Economides, MD, unveils the challenges and opportunities for renal cell carcinoma treatment, focusing on the lack of therapies available in the second-line setting.
Listen
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More