The combination of nanotechnology and photodynamic therapy may be useful in the future treatment of metastatic melanoma, according to researchers in the United States and Brazil.
The combination of nanotechnology and photodynamic therapy may be useful in the future treatment of metastatic melanoma, according to researchers in the United States and Brazil.
The increasing incidence of melanoma around the world has led to an estimated 230,000 new cases of melanoma worldwide since 2012. If diagnosed early, melanoma is treatable. However, as the disease progresses, the potential for cure becomes more remote. In addition, although approximately 91% of melanoma lesions occur on the skin, melanoma lesions on the eyes routinely account for 5% of cases, and those on mucosal surfaces account for approximately 1% of cases.1
If identified early, resected, and treated with a chemotherapeutic agents, such as dacarbazine, in a patient with good performance status, melanoma cure rates range from 97.9% to 99.8%. However, in later stages, the prognosis is substantially worse. The median survival time in patients with unresectable melanoma is approximately 28 months.1
Although newer targeted therapies are beginning to improve the prognosis of metastatic melanoma, further developments are needed. Victoria Monge-Fuentes, MD, of the department of genetics and morphology, University of BrasiÌlia, Brazil, and colleagues are investigating another way to target lesions: through a combination of drugs delivered using nanotechnology and activated by photodynamic therapy. One advantage of photodynamic therapy is its ability to stimulate certain excitation states of melanoma lesions. Through stimulation of oxidative damage, photodynamic therapy may exert anticancer effects, potentially stimulating direct killing of cancer tissue.1
Nanoparticles have been tested as both a drug delivery vehicle and as a method of targeting melanoma cells in murine models. Treatments that have been tested include nanoparticles that deliver medication preferentially to the site of tumors, nanoparticles that inhibit expression of genes in tumors through small interference RNA (siRNA) technology, and radiation-activated particles.2
Nanoparticles laden with chemotherapeutic agents have been tested in mouse models of melanoma. Investigators conjugated doxorubicin to fullerene nanoparticles and compared the efficacy of the nanoparticle formulation with the efficacy of free doxorubicin in a murine model of melanoma. The use of carbon nanostructures allowed scientists to load more than one-third of additional doxorubicin on each nanoparticle than is enabled by other systems. Fullerenes localized in the lysosomes of melanoma cells preferentially within 2 hours of administration. Free doxorubicin, unlike nanoparticle-formulated doxorubicin, tended to reduce the mass of mice spleen and heart tissue. These data suggest that preferential distribution to tumors through nanoparticle delivery of doxorubicin may reduce the risk of systemic adverse events (AEs).2,3
In mice, delivery of siRNA through nanoparticles has been used to successfully reduce expression of ribonucleotide reductase and c-Myc, a regulator oncogene, in melanoma cells. Current siRNA treatments include a cyclodextrin nanoparticle system that was recently investigated in a successful phase Ia/Ib clinical trial.4-6
In 24 patients enrolled in the Ia/Ib trial between May 2008 and September 2010, investigators increased the dosage of siRNA-laden nanoparticles from 3 mg/m2to 30 mg/m2. Enrolled patients had several types of cancer, including melanoma (n = 5), gastrointestinal cancer (n = 8), prostate cancer (n = 2), and other types (n = 9). Common AEs included chills and fever. Common severe AEs included lymphopenia, which occurred in 3 patients, and fatigue, which occurred in 2 patients. Less common severe AEs, occurring in 1 patient each, included hypersensitivity, ischemic colitis, diarrhea, and fever. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated, and with these results, trials are expected to progress to phase II.6
Although nanoparticles can carry chemotherapeutic agents and siRNA, they can also magnify the effects of radiotherapy. For example, nanoparticles may be activated by electromagnetic waves or sound. In mice, scientists have tested intratumoral administration of porphyrin-coated magnetic iron or iron (II, III) oxide nanoparticles. After murine melanoma cells were loaded with a dose of the iron particles each day for 3 days, mice were irradiated with 3 short pulses of external alternating magnetic fields. The treatments reduced the size of tumors, demonstrating that the technology may have some potential.7
With the development of many targeted agents for melanoma, use of nanoparticles may further enhance delivery to tumor cells in the future. In the near future, however, nanotechnology and photodynamic therapy are unlikely to be approved for melanoma therapy, overshadowed by other promising developments in combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, and other immunotherapies.
Gholam Contrasts Lenvatinib With Other Options in Child-Pugh B HCC
December 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Pierre Gholam, MD, discussed how post hoc and real-world analyses build upon the limited available trial data for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B status.
Read More
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More