In this editorial note from Arjun V. Balar, MD, he discusses how the KEYNOTE-57 findings have impacted the treatment landscape for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin—refractory, high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.
Arjun V. Balar, MD
We heard a lot of exciting data presented at the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress in Munich this past October. One set of data that particularly intrigued me was the interim analysis from KEYNOTE-57a single-arm phase II trial of pembrolizumab in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)—refractory, high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).1I know what you are thinking: “Yet another trial of a PD-1 antibody in cancerhow could this be exciting?”
My answer would be that this is potentially the most impactful piece of data for this disease: NMIBC represents more than 70% of all cases every year in the United States and is a costly disease to manage. Although intravesical BCG is the standard of care for high-grade NMIBC, with up to 70% of patients with carcinoma in situ responding to treatment, a significant percentage will ultimately relapse. Subsequent treatment options (termed salvage therapy) are limited, with lower response rates and short response durations; all the while, an overarching concern involves the risk of occult progression to metastatic disease. Therefore, for patients with BCG-refractory disease, radical cystectomy is considered a standard of care, with the primary goal of removing the cancer before micrometastases develop.
Meanwhile, in more advanced disease, we’ve observed major leaps forward with cancer immunotherapy, now an established standard of care in the second- and first-line settings. Naturally, a systemic immunotherapy should be tested in the BCG-refractory setting, and the initial data are quite promising: a 38% complete response (CR) rate at 3 months and more than 80% of those CRs lasting longer than 6 months. Obviously, more follow-up will be needed, but the preliminary interpretation is that these data could be practice changing and may allow patients to keep their bladders.
What is particularly unique in this setting is the potential convergence of medical oncology and urology disciplines in managing bladder cancer like never before. Historically, NMIBC has been exclusively managed by urology from the instillations of intravesical treatments to the periodic cystoscopies, transurethral resections, and collection of urine for cytologic examination to diagnose and monitor the disease.
With the potential introduction of systemic immunotherapy, commonly the domain of medical oncologists, the field can become truly integrated. This opportunity is of paramount importance and must be executed flawlessly for the appropriate care of our patients. Without close collaboration between both disciplines, patients may run the risk of being treated with immunotherapy without the close cystoscopic monitoring necessary to know if the treatment is working or if the opposite problem is occurring: excellent vigilance of the bladder without the expertise and oversight of a specialist trained to safely administer systemic cancer treatments. Other trials are under way that may further challenge existing treatment paradigms and care provider roles in this disease. As a bladder cancer oncologist, I’m excited about the futurearen’t you?
Reference:
de Wit R, Kulkarni GS, Uchio E, et al. Pembrolizumab for high-risk (HR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG): phase II KEYNOTE-057 trial. Presented at: European Society of Medical Oncology 2018 Congress; October 19-23, Munich, Germany. Abstract 864O. academic.oup. com/annonc/article/29/suppl_8/mdy283.073/5140263.
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More