IO-TKI Combination Therapies: Are They Synergistic or Additive?
Drs Tannir and Tykodi share their differing views on the effect an IO and a TKI agent have when combined for advanced clear cell RCC treatment.
Nizar Tannir, MD: Before we move on to the next segment of the program, I want to challenge [a point]. Moshe mentioned that he believes that the IO [immunotherapy]-TKI [tyrosine kinase inhibitor] combination is synergistic and not additive. I personally believe that they’re additive. If they were synergistic, we’d see close to 90% or higher responses. When you look at the monotherapy data with each, an anti–PD-1 and a TKI, when you combine them, you’re basically adding the ORR [overall response rate] of each one individually. Scott, as an immunotherapist, do you believe there’s synergy when you combine an IO and TKI? Or do you believe that they’re just additive?
Scott Tykodi, MD, PhD: In the frontline setting, it’s hard to know. In a population of tumors, we think some respond better to a TKI, some respond better to IO, and some probably respond to either. The unknown is whether there are tumors that only respond to the combination and would be refractory to each drug in isolation. In my mind, that is what we mean by synergy. If we say that the IO and TKI components aren’t all that different from each other, the combination that’s the most robust in pulling patients into that pool and drives a response only because of the combination should be the most effective combination. But I don’t know of any data that show you that’s a true phenomenon.
The place where we can find out if that’s true is in the second-line setting, where you have PD-1–refractory disease, and you ask the question, if I continue PD-1 blockade and add a TKI, is that better than giving the TKI in isolation? There are studies asking that exact question. That’s going to be very instructive. If the answer is that the doublet is clearly better than the TKI alone, that proves that there’s a synergistic component, that maintaining PD-1 blockade plus the TKI is somehow beneficial, and there has to be some biological coordination between the 2 drugs. I’m excited to see the readout from those trials, because that’s a hugely important question in the field.
Nizar Tannir, MD: That’s a good point and well taken. Thank you both for your thoughtful input on this.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Enhancing Precision in Immunotherapy: CD8 PET-Avidity in RCC
March 1st 2024In this episode of Emerging Experts, Peter Zang, MD, highlights research on baseline CD8 lymph node avidity with 89-Zr-crefmirlimab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and response to immunotherapy.
Listen
Beyond the First-Line: Economides on Advancing Therapies in RCC
February 1st 2024In our 4th episode of Emerging Experts, Minas P. Economides, MD, unveils the challenges and opportunities for renal cell carcinoma treatment, focusing on the lack of therapies available in the second-line setting.
Listen
McGregor and Participants Discuss Impact of Drug Efficacy and Histology on nccRCC Care
October 17th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Bradley McGregor, MD, moderated a discussion on prognosis and treatment approaches for a patient with stage IV papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Read More
