Comparing Dosing Schedules With Standard Therapies

Joshua K. Sabari, MD, discusses how the dosing schedule of ifinatamab deruxtecan offers advantages in terms of simplicity and treatment adherence vs topotecan and lurbinectedin, suggesting that it may enhance the overall quality of life for patients undergoing treatment for SCLC.

EP: 1.Clinical Impressions and Therapy Goals

EP: 2.Considerations for Extended Chemoimmunotherapy

EP: 3.Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Considerations

EP: 4.Mechanism of Action of BiTE Immunotherapy

EP: 5.Interpreting DeLLphi-301 Trial Results: ORR, Duration of Response, and Long-Term Outcomes

EP: 6.Significance of Durable Responses in DeLLphi-301 Trial

EP: 7.Expectations for PFS and OS in Relapsed/Refractory SCLC

EP: 8.Future Potential in Combination Therapies

EP: 9.Dual Maintenance With BiTE and PD-L1 Inhibitors

EP: 10.B7-H3 Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential

EP: 11.Current Practices in B7-H3 Testing

EP: 12.Interpreting IDeate-Lung02 Trial Outcomes

Now Viewing

EP: 13.Comparing Dosing Schedules With Standard Therapies

EP: 14.Potential Synergies With T-Cell Engagers

Video content above is prompted by the following:

In terms of simplicity, treatment adherence, and quality of life, how does the dosing schedule of ifinatamab deruxtecan compare with those of topotecan and lurbinectedin?

Recent Videos