Stacey Stein, MD, discusses the patient population and outcomes of the IMbrave150 trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Stacey Stein, MD, associate professor of internal medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and assistant medical director of the clinical trials office at Yale Cancer Center, discusses the patient population and outcomes of the IMbrave150 trial (NCT03434379) of atezolizumab (Tecentriq) plus bevacizumab (Avastin) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
In the phase 3 trial, 501 patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to receive atezolizumab/bevacizumab or sorafenib (Nexavar). At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the coprimary end point of overall survival (OS) was met with a median OS of 19.2 months with atezolizumab/bevacizumab compared with 13.4 months with sorafenib, a difference of 5.8 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85; descriptive P < 0.001). This was a significantly longer OS than what was seen in prior trials, Stein said.
According to Stein, trials of treatments for patients with advanced and unresectable HCC, including IMbrave150, focus on patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis or those without cirrhosis, as opposed to those patients with Child-Pugh B or C who are more likely to have poor outcomes regardless of treatment. These patients with a good performance status and liver function don’t represent the real-world population with HCC; however, several retrospective analyses of real-world patients have shown modest efficacy and responses in the Child-Pugh B population. Although toxicities need to be monitored more closely in these patients with poor liver function, they may also benefit from the combination.
TRANSCRIPTION:
0:08 | The OS was improved by a few months to a median OS of [19.2] months and these were numbers that we have never previously seen in this disease, so we really started to move the needle. In terms of the patient population that was selected, trials in HCC…usually focus only on patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis or patients without cirrhosis, and so overall, it's a well-compensated patient population with good performance status and good liver function, which may not always represent all of the patients we see in the real world in clinic. But there [are] some data that show that we're able to treat patients with Child-Pugh B disease without increased harm, and they still get a benefit from the regimen.
Amivantamab/Lazertinib Maintains OS Benefit in EGFR+ NSCLC
January 15th 2025During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Joshua K. Sabari, MD, continued discussion of key outcomes from the MARIPOSA trial and toxicity management in patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Considering How Favorable Risk Affects Treatment in ccRCC
January 3rd 2025During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel J. George, MD, discusses how often community oncology participants see patients with favorable-risk vs intermediate- or high-risk RCC, and how it changes their treatment options.
Read More
MARIPOSA Trial Shows PFS Benefit With or Without CNS Disease in NSCLC
December 24th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Joshua K. Sabari, MD, discussed the mechanism of action of amivantamab and the MARIPOSA trial in patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Gholam Contrasts Lenvatinib With Other Options in Child-Pugh B HCC
December 21st 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Pierre Gholam, MD, discussed how post hoc and real-world analyses build upon the limited available trial data for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B status.
Read More