When given alone or with tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, TILT-123 given intravenously or intratumorally is safe and feasible for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.
TILT-123 treatment alone or in combination with tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy administered intravenously or intratumorally is safe and feasible for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, according to data from a phase trial (NCT04217473) presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Immuno-Oncology Congress . The study data showed that no dose-limiting toxicities were observed.
Treatment with the oncolytic adenovirus in combination with TIL therapy resulted in 3 grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) related to TILT-123 and 5 related to TIL therapy, although no AEs were considered dose limiting; however, 4 serious AEs were related to TILT-123 , including fever (n = 3) and infection in the injected tumor (n = 1).
Notably, the disease control rate was 38% (n = 16). Of the evaluated patients, 62.5% had progressive disease, 25% had stable disease (SD), 6.3% had a partial response (PR), and 6.3% had a complete response (CR).
“Clinical activity of this combined treatment has been observed, including responses in patients with hard-to-treat melanoma,” said Tine J. Monberg, MD, of the National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital in Herlev, Denmark.
Oncolytic virus therapy is known to kill cancer cells and increase the potential to initiate an immune response against a patient’s tumor, making it an appealing therapeutic approach, Monberg explained in a presentation of the data.
TILT-123 is an oncolytic adenovirus that is engineered for intravenous (IV) or intratumoral administration and can replicate selectively in cancer cells. In turn, this results in direct lytic tumor killing and exposure of tumor antigens to the immune system. Notably, this therapeutic approach also has a high level of transgene production, which leads to the recruitment of cells.
Investigators aimed to explore TILT-123’s utility when combined with other types of immune therapy, such as TILs, based on the promise of utilizing an oncolytic adenovirus in patients, Monberg said. They hypothesized that combining TILT-123 with TIL therapy would increase the efficacy of TIL therapy, limit the need for toxic pre- and postconditioning regimens, and elicit combined antitumor benefits of the 2 therapies.
Patients with checkpoint inhibitor-refractory or recurrent stage III to IV melanoma who were aged 18 to 75 years were eligible for enrollment into the phase 1, dose-escalation, multicenter trial. Additional eligibility criteria required a World Health Organization performance status of no more than 1, a resectable tumor greater than 9 mm for TIL production, and at least 1 additional tumor available for injections.
Furthermore, patients had to have evaluable disease burden; adequate organ function; a lactate dehydrogenase value of less than 3 times the upper limit of normal; and no use of immunosuppressive medications.
Eligible patients received an IV virus dose of 3 109 and an intratumoral virus dose of 3 109 (cohort 1; n = 3), 3 1010 and 3 1010 (cohort 2; n = 3), 3 1011 and 1 1011 (cohort 3; n = 3) 1 1012 and 3 1011 (cohort 5; n = 4). Tumor resection for TIL therapy was performed at baseline and expansion occurred between weeks 4 and 6.
“A patient received the first dose of TILT-123 as an intravenous treatment, and this was followed by 5 treatments intratumorally over a period of 64 days,” Monberg explained.
Furthermore, TIL therapy was administered as a 1-time or 2-time treatment in between virus injections. Patients were evaluated on day 36 before TIL treatment, and the final evaluation was made on day after all treatment had been completed.
The primary end point of the investigation was to evaluate the safety of TILT-123 therapy. Secondary end points included the safety of TILT-123 in combination with TIL therapy and efficacy evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and PET criteria.
Of the 16 patients enrolled in the ongoing study, the majority (56.3%) were female and the median age of those enrolled was 65.5 years (range, 25-75). Additionally, 75% of patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0, and 25% had a performance status of 1. Of these enrolled patients, 18.9% had a BRAF V600 mutation and 81.3% had BRAF wild type.
Moreover, 25% of patients had unresectable stage IIIC disease and 75% had stage IV disease. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range, 1-7) . Histologies of patients enrolled included cutaneous (n = 7), uveal (n = 4) , and mucosal (n = 5) .
The most common AEs reported in patients related to TILT-123 included fever (63%), pain at the injection site (44%), and fatigue (38%). The most common AEs reported in patients related to TIL therapy were fever (56%), chills (38%), and fatigue (25%).
In the presentation, Monberg stated that 1 patient with mucosal melanoma had a durable CR, 1 patient with cutaneous melanoma had an ongoing PR, and 2 patients (1 with uveal and 1 with cutaneous melanoma) had long-lasting SD of more than 10 months.
Additional results regarding PET responses on day 78 showed that 50.0%, 21.4%, 7.1%, and 21.4% of patients (n = 14) had progressive metabolic disease (PMD), stable metabolic disease (SMD), minor metabolic response (MMR), and partial metabolic response (PMR), respectively, with the combination approach. Disease control was reported in 7 of 14 patients. Furthermore, 35.7%, 28.6%, 14.3%, 21.4% of patients had PMD, SMD, MMR, and PMR, respectively, when treated with TILT-123 alone. Disease control was reported in 9 of 14 patients.
Monberg concluded by reviewing the case of a 48-year-old patient with a durable CR who had a diagnosis of resistant, unresectable mucosal melanoma. She had been previously treated with 7 cycles of ipilimumab (Yervoy) and nivolumab (Opdivo) therapy and on day 78, she had a PR and PMR with study treatment. After day 270, investigators confirmed complete pathological response, and the patient is continuing treatment with TILT-123 in the extension arm of the protocol.
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More