SL-172154 is being studied in a phase 1a/1b study in acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, as well as other phase 1 studies in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
The FDA granted an orphan drug designation to SL-172154 for the potential treatment of patients with AML, according to Shattuck Labs, Inc.1
SL-172154 is an investigational ARC fusion protein. The agent works to inhibit the checkpoint interaction of CD47/SIRPα, as well as activate the CD40 costimulatory receptor to boost antitumor immune response in patients with advanced cancer.
A phase 1a/1b study (NCT05275439) is currently evaluating SL-172154 alone and in combination with azacitidine with or without venetoclax in patients with AML and higher-risk MDS.
“[Patients with] AML have few options for treatment and a poor prognosis. [The] FDA’s decision to grant orphan drug designation to SL-172154 highlights the urgent need for new treatment options,” said Taylor Schreiber, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Shattuck Labs, in a press release. “This is an important first step in our progression to later-stage clinical studies, and we look forward to presenting additional data from the phase 1B dose expansion clinical trial of SL-172154 with azacitidine in [patients with] frontline higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and TP53-mutated AML during a poster presentation at the 2024 European Hematology Association Congress.”
In the phase 1a portion of the study, the dose-escalation part, patients needed to have relapsed/refractory AML or higher-risk MDS and previously received 1 to 4 prior therapies.2 To be included in this part of the study, patients with MDS were required to have intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk disease per the International Prognostic Scoring System. In dose-expansion portion in phase 1b, patients with previously untreated AML with TP53 mutations and previously untreated higher-risk MDS were enrolled.
SL-172154 was given via intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle during phase 1a/b, and azacitidine was given at a dose of 75 mg/m2 IV or subcutaneously once a day on days 1 through 7 or using a 5-2-2 dosing schedule.
When the dose-escalation portion was complete, investigators selected 3 mg/kg to be the dose of SL-172154 used in the dose-expansion portion.
Safety and determining the recommended phase 2 dose of the combination served as primary end points of the study. Secondary end points consisted of preliminary antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of SL-172154 when given as a monotherapy and combined with other agents.
Data from the phase 1b dose-expansion portion of the study showed in the safety population of 14 patients, 11 of whom had secondary AML, the overall response rate (ORR) was 36%, and 2 patients achieved a complete response (CR).3 Another patient achieved a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). The median time to CR was 8.7 weeks. Additionally, 2 patients achieved a partial response (PR), and no responders progressed as of the data cutoff date.
Four of the responders, including 1 with a CR, 1 with CRi, and 2 with PRs, were taken to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Further, the median duration of response and overall survival have not been reached.
Looking at safety, SL-172154 had an acceptable safety profile. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which were reported in 18 patients (46%). All IRRs, except 2 which were grade 3, were grade 1 and 2. Other TEAEs included fatigue (13%) and hypokalemia (10%).
It is expected that additional findings from this portion of the study looking at SL-172154 given with azacitidine in patients with previously untreated TP53-mutated AML and higher-risk MDS will be released in the middle of 2024.
In addition to this trial, SL-172154 is also being evaluated as monotherapy (NCT04406623) and in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or mirvetuximab soravtansine (Elahere; NCT05483933) in phase 1 studies for the treatment of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.1
What Is Dark Zone Lymphoma, and Is It Clinically Relevant?
January 16th 2025Dark zone lymphoma includes aggressive B-cell lymphomas with shared molecular features. While some respond to escalated treatment, others remain resistant, highlighting the need for targeted approaches to improve outcomes.
Read More
Telehealth Continues to Show Importance Post COVID-19 in Rare Diseases
December 29th 2024In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Doris M. Ponce, MD, MS, a bone marrow transplant specialist, discussed how telehealth made a significant impact on patients with rare diseases receiving medical care and why the rules from the COVID-19 era should be brought back to continue helping these patients.
Read More
Brunner Discusses Dosing Approaches for ESA and Novel Therapies for Low-Risk MDS
December 23rd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Andrew M. Brunner, MD, discussed dosing strategy for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as well as dose modifications and safety for the novel agents imetelstat and luspatercept.
Read More