Martin Dreyling, MD, discusses how the safety and efficacy results from the TRIANGLE study in mantle cell lymphoma differ from prior expectations.
Martin Dreyling, MD, University Hospital LMU Munich, in Germany, discusses how the safety and efficacy results from the TRIANGLE study (NCT02858258) in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) differ from prior expectations.
The TRIANGLE study sought to evaluate whether standard treatment with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) was superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib (Imbruvica), but without ASCT, in patients with MCL.
After more than 5 years of follow-up, the results from the study demonstrate significant advancements in the treatment of younger patients with MCL. Progression-free survival and overall survival were both significantly improved in the experimental arms containing ibrutinib, with a clinically meaningful benefit of approximately 10% vs the standard treatment. Additionally, rituximab maintenance, when combined with ibrutinib, continues to enhance patient outcomes, further supporting its inclusion in treatment protocols.
Regarding the role of ASCT, Dreyling says that it is no longer required for the overall patient group receiving ibrutinib-based therapy. However, approximately 10% of very high-risk patients still derive benefit from the addition of ASCT. These results underscore the progress made while highlighting areas that require personalized treatment strategies.
Transcription:
0:10 | Well, it is fair to say some of these results were somewhat expected and others were surprising. So, first of all, when it comes to the modified progression-free survival, which was the primary study aim, we somewhat expected that the addition of the targeted treatment does improve the outcome. What was somewhat a surprise is that also ibrutinib, instead of autologous stem cell transplant, still resulted in a significant improvement of progression-free survival.
0:46 | And finally, what is somewhat surprising, and that is in contrast to a number of prior studies that we could increase overall survival in the range of 10%, so 1 out of 10 patients, and that is really a major improvement, which means, essentially, whatever kind of salvage treatment you consider, you will not catch up for the advantage in first-line treatment.
Telehealth Continues to Show Importance Post COVID-19 in Rare Diseases
December 29th 2024In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Doris M. Ponce, MD, MS, a bone marrow transplant specialist, discussed how telehealth made a significant impact on patients with rare diseases receiving medical care and why the rules from the COVID-19 era should be brought back to continue helping these patients.
Read More
Brunner Discusses Dosing Approaches for ESA and Novel Therapies for Low-Risk MDS
December 23rd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Andrew M. Brunner, MD, discussed dosing strategy for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as well as dose modifications and safety for the novel agents imetelstat and luspatercept.
Read More
Epcoritamab Delivers Durable Responses in Anthracycline-Ineligible LBCL
December 12th 2024Fixed-duration, subcutaneous epcoritamab-bysp achieved durable responses with a manageable safety profile in older patients with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma who are not candidates for anthracycline-based therapy.
Read More