The novel oncolytic virus Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec) and Toca FC (extended-release 5-fluorocytosine [5-FC]) induced durable responses in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), for a median duration of response of 35.1+ months, according to findings from a phase I study presented during the 2017 AACRNCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics. In a pooled analysis of 3 phase I studies, the virus also proved to be well tolerated with fewer any-grade adverse events (AEs) than with standard chemotherapy.1
Clark C. Chen, MD, PhD
The novel oncolytic virus Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec) and Toca FC (extended-release 5-fluorocytosine [5-FC]) induced durable responses in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), for a median duration of response of 35.1+ months, according to findings from a phase I study presented during the 2017 AACRNCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics. In a pooled analysis of 3 phase I studies, the virus also proved to be well tolerated with fewer any-grade adverse events (AEs) than with standard chemotherapy.1
The virus is injected into the site of highest tumor concentration in the brain by a surgeon. Later, Toca FC, a novel formulation of an antifungal drug, 5-FC, is given to the patient orally, and the CD gene converts the 5-FC into 5-FU.
The virus has selective ability to replicate in cancer cells because it affects only dividing cells, said Chen, a professor, Lyle French Chair, and department head of Neurosurgery at the University of Minnesota, and because 5-FC is benign in normal cells. Additionally, the virus can replicate and spread and has the ability to track the tumors.
In preclinical studies, Chen noted that the investigators saw not only tumor cell death but also the depletion of immunosuppressive cells, which led to significant T-cell infiltration.2“This approach is fundamentally not just a gene therapy but also an immune therapy that combines the efficacy of both approaches,” said Chen
Three phase I studies were conducted to test the safety and tolerability of Toca 511 and Toca FC in 127 total patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.1The first dose-escalating study looked at 56 patients who had undergone surgical resection of their brain tumor (NCT01470794), and Chen focused on safety and efficacy results from this study in his presentation. In the second study, the tumor was infused into 54 patients with unresectable tumors (NCT01156584), and the third focused on neoadjuvant intravenous administration of the virus in patients with grade III/IV glioma (NCT01985256).
In the resectable trial, patients were eligible if they had a good performance status, had never received bevacizumab (Avastin), and if their tumor was ≤5 cm. All patients underwent surgery before receiving injection of Toca 511 once at a dose between 1.4 x 107 and 4.8 x 109 TU, followed approximately 6 weeks later by administration of cyclic Toca FC from 135 to 220 mg/kg/day.
A majority of the patients (77%) were male, 70% had a Karnofsky performance status of 90 to 100, 82% had GBM, and 11% had AA. Half of the patients were at their first recurrence at baseline, but 27% had had at least 3 recurrences.
Of 53 evaluable patients, 11.3% achieved a durable response rate lasting ≥24 weeks, all of which were complete responses (CRs), and an additional 18.9% had stable disease. Responses were observed in 4 patients withIDH1wildtype GBM and in 2 patients withIDH1-mutant AA.
Twenty-three patients were included in a higher-dose subgroup who met the criteria for the phase II/III study. These patients were in their first or
second recurrence, had recurrent GBM or AA, had no prior bevacizumab therapy, and had a tumor size ≤5 cm.
In this subgroup, 21.7% achieved a CR lasting ≥24 weeks, and 21.7% had stable disease. The median duration of response was 35.7+ months. The responses occurred in 3 patients withIDH1wild-type GBM and 2 patients withIDH1-mutant AA. Chen noted that they did not believe thatIDHmutation status affected responses.
“Responses occurred gradually over a 6- to 19-month period. We actually saw patients who went from partial response to a total response late in treatment,” Chen said.
The median overall survival (OS) in the higher-dose subgroup was 14.4 months, which compared favorably with historical controls of a median OS of 8.4 months seen with lomustine (Gleostine) for GBM.
The 1-year OS in the overall study was 49.1% and 65.2% in the higher-dose subgroup. At 2 years, the OS was 24.5% overall and 34.8% in the subgroup, and at 3 years the OS rates were 13.4% and 26.1%, respectively.
Long-term survivors tended to have lower-grade tumors in the Toca 511 and Toca FC study, Chen noted. He also added that an immune abscopal effect was also seen whereby distant tumors that were not injected with the virus also responded to therapy.
Across the 3 studies, 25.2% of patients had grade 1/2 treatment-related AEs, most frequently fatigue (11%), and grade ≥3 events were seen in 7.1%. Seven (5.5%) serious AEs of grade ≥3 were observed, including grade 3 brain edema, grade 4 subdural hygroma, grade 3 asthenia with grade 2 pyrexia (with unrelated pulmonary embolism), grade 1 convulsion, grade 3 cerebral cyst, and 2 cases of grade 3 vasogenic cerebral edema. No deaths occurred that were related to the virus, Chen noted.
Notably, no hematologic toxicity was noted with the virus in patients with GBM, whereas standard-of-care lomustine often showed high rates of hematologic AEs.
Toca 511 and Toca FC received a Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA in February 2017 for treatment of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. The FDA also granted a Fast Track designation to the virus in July 2015.
The Toca 5 trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase II/III trial that is looking at Toca 511 and Toca 5C compared with investigator’s choice of lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab in patients with GBM or AA who are undergoing resection following their first or second recurrence (NCT02414165). The trial recently started to enroll patients.
References
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Oncologists Discuss a Second-Generation BTK for Relapsed/Refractory CLL
December 18th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Daniel A. Ermann, MD, discussed evaluation and treatment for a patient with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after receiving venetoclax and obinutuzumab.
Read More