Results from a study evaluating circulating tumor tissue–modified viral (TTMV)–human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA among patients treated for HPV-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is of interest.
The ability to predict disease recurrence is a clinically useful tool for any blood test. Results from a study evaluating circulating tumor tissue–modified viral (TTMV)–human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA among patients treated for HPV-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is of interest, according to research presented at the 2022 Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancers Symposium.
The test produced a high positive predictive value (PPV) of 95% for patients who received treatment for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer and may detect recurrence earlier than imaging or other standard methods of recurrence monitoring (FIGURE).1
“While detection of tumor-specific DNA circulating in a patient’s bloodstream has shown potential as a powerful yet minimally invasive diagnostic tool for several cancers, this is the first study to demonstrate broad clinical utility and validity of the biomarker in HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer,” Glenn J. Hanna, MD, director of the Center for Salivary and Rare Head and Neck Cancers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, said in his presentation of the data.
The primary aim of the multi-institutional study is to determine the PPV of circulating TTMV-HPV DNA to determine recurrent HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer during the surveillance period for patients.
The population of patients consisted of those treated for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer without distant disease who were at least 3 months post completion of standard defi nitive therapy. HPV status was provided by the clinician, and patients also needed at least 1 TTMVHPV DNA result found during surveillance.
The investigators compared all positive results from the study to clinical disease status reported by the provider for confi rmation.
A total of 1076 test results were included in the research across 118 clinical sites. Investigators reported a median of 2 cases per site. The median age for the population was 63 years, and most patients were male (88%), had positive p16 status (99%), and had at least 1 TTMV-HPV DNA test result (78%). Twenty-two percent of the population had more than 1 test result. The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 6-22).
A total of 996 tests (92.6%) were negative, and the remaining 80 (7.4%) were positive. When evaluating those who were positive, 26% had known or confirmed disease and 74% had clinically indeterminate/no evidence of disease (NED) status.
HPV-16 disease was eventually identified in 55 (93%) of 59 patients with a positive TTMV-HPV DNA test result. Of the 4 remaining patients, 2 had clinically suspicious lesions and 2 remained clinically NED; all 4 patients had TTMV-HPV DNA values between 16 and 79 fragments/mL. Moreover, 48% of patients with positive results and 46% with indeterminate/NED status were tested more than 12 months after treatment completion.
The values between patients with active disease and those with indeterminate/NED status were relatively similar and not statistically signifi cant, although a trend existed toward higher values in patients with active disease (P = .27).
Hanna noted that establishing a cutoff value for determining clinically detectable disease is not feasible at this moment and that newly positive test results found during surveillance should prompt further examination to identify recurrence early. (See BOX2 for next steps for the use of TTMV-HPV DNA.)
“Most patients had no other evidence of disease or clinically indeterminate disease status at the time of their fi rst positive biomarker test,” he said. “Incorporating a test for TTMV-HPV DNA into routine posttreatment follow-up can enable physicians to detect recurrent cancers earlier and allow us to start recommended interventions more quickly to improve outcomes.”
Conservative Management Is on the Rise in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
January 17th 2025In an interview with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS, discusses the significance of a 10-year rise in active surveillance and watchful waiting in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Read More
What Is Dark Zone Lymphoma, and Is It Clinically Relevant?
January 16th 2025Dark zone lymphoma includes aggressive B-cell lymphomas with shared molecular features. While some respond to escalated treatment, others remain resistant, highlighting the need for targeted approaches to improve outcomes.
Read More
Controversy Swirls Around the Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors as Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy
January 15th 2025CDK4/6 inhibitors like abemaciclib and ribociclib improve invasive disease-free survival in breast cancer trials, but controversy surrounds study designs, bias, and cost-effectiveness, raising critical questions about their clinical benefit.
Read More