2024 saw the establishment of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil as the preferred regimen for patients with localized adenocarcinoma.
In 2024, a number of advances in the gastroesophageal cancer arena made significant inroads in clinical practice. Chief among them was the establishment of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; FLOT) as the preferred regimen for patients with localized adenocarcinoma because radiation does not improve outcomes, according to Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, associate professor at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, New York.1
Findings for fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd; Enhertu) combination therapies in HER2-positive disease and the final overall survival (OS) analysis of dual HER2/ PD-1 blockade in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 trial (NCT03615326) have also shed light on treatment approaches, and the first-line FDA approval of zolbetuximab-clzb (Vyloy) plus chemotherapy for claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2)–positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors was a notable regulatory decision. Janjigian highlighted these updates in a presentation at the 42nd Annual CFS, an event sponsored by Physicians’ Education Resource, LLC.1 Janjigian is also associate attending physician, and chief, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, in New York, New York.
Janjigian emphasized that radiation therapy should not be used because it has demonstrated a lack of benefit, but with that come new investigations of FLOT combination therapies. FLOT demonstrated superiority over radiation therapy, according to data from the phase 3 ESOPEC study (NCT02509286), which showed that patients who received neoadjuvant and adjuvant FLOT experienced improved OS compared with those given neoadjuvant chemoradiation with the CROSS regimen (paclitaxel/carboplatin).
The median OS was 66 months vs 37 months, respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 50.6% and 38.7%.2
Additionally, findings from the phase 2/3 TOPGEAR study (NCT01924819) showed that the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy did not improve OS outcomes in the perioperative setting.3 Patients who received chemotherapy (n=288) experienced a median OS of 49 months vs 46 months among those who received chemoradiotherapy (n=286; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.31).
Building upon these findings, the phase 3 MATTERHORN trial (NCT04592913) examined neoadjuvant durvalumab (Imfinzi) plus FLOT followed by adjuvant durvalumab plus FLOT and then durvalumab monotherapy. When compared with a regimen of FLOT plus placebo (n=474), durvalumab plus FLOT (n=474) yielded a statistically significant improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rate in patients with gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma.4 Rates were 19% vs 7%, respectively (Δ, 12%; OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.03-4.67; P<.00001).
However, data from the phase 3 KEY- NOTE-585 trial (NCT03221426) showed that this patient population did not experience a statistically significant improvement in event-free survival when treated with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P=.0198).5 Furthermore, patients in the main plus FLOT cohort experienced a pCR rate of 13.0% (95% CI, 10.2%- 16.3%) when given the pembrolizumab regimen (n=502) vs 2.4% (95% CI, 1.3%-4.2%) when given the placebo regimen (n=505; Δ, 10.6%; 95% CI, 7.4%-14.0%).
Janjigian noted that up to 30% of GEJ adenocarcinomas are HER2-positive and 30% of HER2-positive GEJ tumors harbor coalterations of the RTK/RAS/PI3K pathway, leading to intrinsic resistance. She added HER2 inhibition alone in the first line is insufficient to overcome this intrinsic resistance, as shown by results of several negative studies such as the phase 3 JACOB trial (NCT01774786).1
The 2021 FDA approval of pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab (Herceptin), fluoropyrimidine, and platinum-containing chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma based on data from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-811 trial (NCT03615326) marked an important step forward. She highlighted the restriction of this immunotherapy approval for patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of at least 1%.1,6
Data from the final analysis of the KEYNOTE-811 revealed that antitumor activity was higher in patients with PD-L1 CPS of at least 1% with an overall response rate (ORR) change of 14.7% (95% CI, 7.1%- 22.2%) seen for patients treated with the pembrolizumab regimen (n=298) vs placebo regimen (n=296).6,7 An ORR change of 12.6% (95% CI, 5.6%-19.4%) was seen in the intention-to-treat population of patients given pembrolizumab (n=350) vs placebo (n=348). Janjigian noted that the incidences of immune-mediate adverse effects and infusion reactions were as expected.1,7
Several combination therapies with T-DXd in the first-line HER2-positive metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma/ gastric cancer/GEJ adenocarcinoma setting are also under investigation. Findings from the phase 1b/2 DESTINY-Gastric03 trial (NCT04379596) showed that the highest ORRs observed thus far were in the cohort receiving T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg plus 5-FU/ capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 (n=41) and in the cohort receiving standard-of-care trastuzumab plus 5-FU/capecitabine plus cisplatin/oxaliplatin (n=29); the respective ORRs were 78% (95% CI, 62%-90%) and 76% (95% CI, 56%-90%).8
Data from the phase 3 CheckMate 649 trial (NCT02872116) also demonstrated that a nivolumab (Opdivo) plus FOLFOX (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) regimen (n=23) bested a chemotherapy- alone regimen (n=21) for patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) disease.9 The median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI, 8.4-not estimable) vs 12.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-16.5), respectively (unstratified HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.74). Among patients with microsatellite stable disease, the median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 12.4-14.5) in the nivolumab plus FOLFOX arm (n=696) vs 11.5 months (95% CI, 10.8- 12.5) in the chemotherapy-alone arm (n=682; unstratified HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89).
When broken down by CPS score, 36-month follow-up data showed that patients who experienced the most OS benefit with the nivolumab regimen vs chemotherapy regimen were those with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 10% (unstratified HR, 0.66), followed by those with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 5% (unstratified HR, 0.69). The unstratified HR for death was 0.78 among the overall population.9
Janjigian noted that the OS improvement seen with zolbetuximab plus CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) vs the control arm in the phase 3 GLOW study (NCT03462719) was similar to that seen in the phase 3 SPOTLIGHT trial (NCT03504397) with zolbetuximab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium (folinic acid), and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6; n=283) vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (n=282).1,10,11 The median OS was 18.23 (95% CI, 16.43-22.90) vs 15.54 (95% CI, 13.47-16.53) in SPOTLIGHT (HR, 0.750; 95% CI, 0.601-0.936; P=.0053), respectively.
“OS Kaplan-Meier curves [separated] early, and sustained separation [is] import- ant,” Janjigian said.
Janjigian added that there has been a “better ORR benefit [seen] with anti–PD-1 vs anti-CLDN18.2 [agents].... [There was] mini- mal/no improvement in ORR with zolbetuximab.” She noted that anti–PD-1 agents may be better for patients with proximal tumors because less OS benefit was observed with zolbetuximab for patients with GEJ tumors in a subgroup analysis. Janjigian highlighted the importance of prioritizing biomark- er-based therapy with MSI-H status followed by HER2 expression, a PD-L1 CPS greater than 1%, and CLD18.2-high expressions. Additional next steps include the evaluation of CLD18.2 antibody-drug conjugates in the first- and second-line settings.
Cusnir Explores Impact of ARANOTE Data on ARPI Plus ADT Use in mHSPC
December 31st 2024During an in-person Community Case Forum event in Miami, Florida, Mike Cusnir, MD, discussed the ARANOTE study outcomes presented at ESMO 2024 and how they fit into the treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Read More