The FDA did not fully approve sotorasib for the treatment of patients with KRAS G12C-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.
Sotorasib’s sNDA has been rejected by the FDA for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC that has been treated with at least 1 prior line of therapy. The FDA issued a complete response letter and issued a new postmarketing requirement study to be completed no later than February 2028.1
The NDA was supported by findings from the confirmatory phase 3 CodeBreaK 200 trial. The sNDA sought full approval of sotorasib. At an ODAC meeting in October 2023, the committee found in a 10-2 vote that the primary end point of PFS per blinded independent central review could not be reliably interpreted. The ODAC concluded that the difference in PFS between the sotorasib and docetaxel arms was small, and there was no difference in overall survival (OS).
The FDA also expressed concern about the study’s integrity, as there was greater patient dropout observed in the docetaxel arm, as well as patient crossover from the docetaxel arm to the sotorasib arm prior to assessment of disease progression.
CodeBreaK 200 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, confirmatory, phase 3 study of sotorasib vs docetaxel in the ITT population. To be eligible for enrollment, patients must have received 1 or more previous treatments, including platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor, and have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.3
Overall, 345 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to receive oral sotorasib 960 mg (n = 171) or intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 174).
At a median follow-up of 17.7 months (interquartile range, 16.4-20.1), there was a 34% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the sotorasib arm compared with docetaxel (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86; P =.0017). This met the trial’s primary end point. The median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.8) in the sotorasib arm vs 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.7) in the docetaxel arm. The 12-month PFS rates were 24.8% with sotorasib and 10.1% with docetaxel.4
Furthermore, the PFS benefit with sotorasib was improved independent of PD-L1 expression. No significant differences were observed in OS rates. The sotorasib arm had a 10.6-month OS (95% CI, 8.9-14.0), and the OS in the docetaxel arm was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.9).
The safety profile of sotorasib was consistent with the known profile, and no new safety signals were identified.
Kim Evaluates New Regimens for EGFR+ Lung Cancer
January 20th 2025During a Community Case Forum event in partnership with the Medical Oncology Association of Southern California, Edward S. Kim, MD, MBA, discussed the FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA trials of newer regimens for EGFR-positive lung cancer.
Read More
Amivantamab/Lazertinib Maintains OS Benefit in EGFR+ NSCLC
January 15th 2025During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Joshua K. Sabari, MD, continued discussion of key outcomes from the MARIPOSA trial and toxicity management in patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More