FDA Approves Ofatumumab for Elongated Treatment of Patients With CLL

FDA Approves Ofatumumab in CLL

Ofatumumab (Arzerra) has received FDA approval for the extended treatment of patients with recurrent or progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients eligible to receive the treatment must show complete or partial response following at least two lines of therapy.

The approval is based on a near doubling in progression-free survival (PFS) seen with the treatment compared with observation in the phase III, open-label, PROLONG trial.

In the study, maintenance ofatumumab demonstrated a median PFS of 29.4 months compared with 15.2 months with observation, representing a 50% reduction in progression risk (HR, 0.50; 94% CI, 0.38-0.66;P<.0001). Additionally, the time to next therapy was 6.9 months longer with ofatumumab compared with observation.

During the trial, 474 patients who experienced either a partial or complete response with either a second- or third-line therapy were randomized to ofatumumab (n = 238) or observation (n = 236). For the first cycle, ofatumumab was administered at an initial dose of 300 mg, followed up 1 week later by a 1000-mg dose. For subsequent cycles, the 1000-mg dose was administered every 8 weeks for up to 2 years.

Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. The median time since diagnosis in the treatment arm was 6 years. Those enrolled in the observation arm had been diagnosed with CLL 5 years prior to enrollment in the trial. Across both arms, the majority of responses to prior therapy were partial responses (~80%). The primary endpoint was PFS, with secondary endpoints focused on duration of response, overall survival, and safety.

The median duration of treatment with ofatumumab was 12.5 months. The median time to next therapy with ofatumumab was 38.0 versus 31.1 months with observation (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.92;P= .011). The independent review committee found a median PFS of 30.4 months with ofatumumab compared with 14.8 months with observation (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.72;P<.0001). After a median follow-up of 19.1 months, a substantial difference in median overall survival was not yet observed between the two arms (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.52-1.37;P= .4877).

The most common grade &ge;3 adverse events for ofatumumab versus observation were neutropenia (24% vs 10%) and infections (13% vs 8%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs, for ofatumumab versus observation, were neutropenia (24% vs 9%) and pneumonia (7% vs 5%). Eight percent of patients in the ofatumumab arm experienced an AE that resulted in treatment discontinuation.

Ofatumumab was initially approved as a treatment for patients with CLL who had received all other available therapies in October 2009. This indication was extended to include previously untreated patients with CLL who were ineligible for fludarabine-based therapy in April 2014.

Ofatumumab continues to be assessed across a variety of settings in clinical trials. A phase III study is comparing the CD20 inhibitor with rituximab (Rituxan) for patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma following relapse on a rituximab containing-regimen. This study was initiated in 2010 and continues to enroll patients, with a goal of accruing 516 participants (NCT01200589).

References

1. van Oers MHJ, Kuliczkowski K, Smolej L, et al. Ofatumumab maintenance versus observation in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (PROLONG): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study [Publish online ahead of print September 13, 2015].Lancet Oncol. doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00143-6.