Treatment with niraparib elicited durable conditional progression-free survival rates vs placebo in patients with ovarian cancer whose tumors were homologous recombination deficient.
In patients with ovarian cancer whose tumors were homologous recombination deficient (HRD), treatment with niraparib (Zejula) led to durable conditional progression-free survival (cPFS) rates compared with placebo up to 4 years post randomization, according to results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Findings were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Gynaecological Cancers Congress 2023.1
Investigators reported on the cPFS, which represents the probability that patients remain free of progression and death at a predefined time after reaching a predefined landmark standpoint.
“In the subset of patients who survived either 1 or 2 years post randomization in the PRIMA study, we evaluated the probability of being alive and progression free for an additional 2 years,” Antonio González-Martín, MD, PhD, director of the Department of Medical Oncology at Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain, said during a presentation of the data.
In the HRD population, cPFS at 2 years was 51% in the niraparib arm vs 29% in the placebo arm. The 1-year landmark cPFS was 62% vs 50%, respectively, and the 2-year landmark cPFS was 74% vs 60%.
The standard PFS rate at 3 years was 44% in the niraparib arm and 23% in the placebo arm in the HRD population. At 4 years, the rate for PFS was 38% for niraparib and 17% for placebo. Estimates for 2-year cPFS rates were higher at each additional year of PFS.
In the overall population, cPFS from the 1-year landmark was 54% in the niraparib arm vs 46% in the placebo arm and the 2-year landmark was 67% in the niraparib arm vs 64% in the placebo arm. Standard PFS rate at 3 years was 29% vs 18%, respectively, and at 4 years the standard PFS rate was 24% vs 14%, respectively. “Again, the estimates for 2-year cPFS rates were higher at each additional year of PFS,” González-Martín said.
The phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT OV26/GOG 3012 study evaluated niraparib as frontline maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Study participants were at high risk for disease progression: Thirty-five percent had stage IV disease, 99.6% of patients with stage III disease had residual disease post primary debulking surgery, 67% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and only 31% achieved a partial response to first-line chemotherapy.
In the primary analysis of the study,2 investigators reported that niraparib significantly extended PFS compared with placebo in patients with HRD tumors (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.59; P < .001). In the overall population, researchers noted a 38% chance of death (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001).
Updated long-term PFS and safety evaluation at data cutoff of November 2021 suggested that patients treated with niraparib were more likely to be free of progression and death at 4 years than those who received placebo in both the HRD population (38% in the niraparib arm vs 17% in the placebo arm) and overall population (24% vs 14%, respectively).3 In this update, adverse events were manageable and consistent with the primary analysis.
“Conditional PFS is a clinically relevant measure that may be useful for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, characterized by high rates of progression in the first 2 years post diagnosis,” González-Martín said.
The findings suggest that patients who are free from death and progression at the 1- and 2-year landmarks had a high probability of being alive and progression-free 2 years later. “This illustrates the long-term effect of niraparib and supports its use as a first-line maintenance therapy,” GonzálezMartín concluded.
Fellow's Perspective: Patient Case of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
November 13th 2024In a discussion with Peers & Perspectives in Oncology, fellowship program director Marc J. Braunstein, MD, PhD, FACP, and hematology/oncology fellow Olivia Main, MD, talk about their choices for a patient with transplant-eligible multiple myeloma and the data behind their decisions.
Read More