Stringent and dedicated interventions are necessary to handle the spread of COVID-19, as this represents a major healthcare challenge for humanity, says Daniel Vorobiof, MD.
The spread of COVID-19 continues to create unique circumstances and challenges for cancer care. These challenges can be further compounded by variables such as geography and a variety of health setups.
Due to their immunocompromised situation, cancer patients are more susceptible to infection. They typically require repeat visits to the hospital for care and receive a variety of potential immunosuppressive treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The risk incurred is significant, with one study suggesting that cancer patients are 3.5 times more likely to be infected than the general population. According to the World Health Organization, they are 5 times more likely to die.
As such, specialists in the field of oncology must prepare swiftly for the reality of different treatment decisions, even involving rationing care to some of their patients.
In response, several cancer centers around the globe have implemented guidelines and protocols to reduce these risks, while still providing quality continuous cancer care.
Their efforts revolve around one central question: whether delaying care or bringing their patients into the hospital environment presents the greater risk to their patients.
In a recent article, Dr. Masumi Ueda and her colleagues draw conclusions from their own experience in Seattle, while considering a number of challenges such as infection and environmental control, outpatient care and treatment decisions, inpatient care, as well as ethical implications and the physical well- being of the medical staff.
With that in mind, I would like to present several effective ways hospitals have responded that are worthy of consideration:
A critical challenge for hospitals is keeping patients and staff safe in what is a naturally crowded environment. Due to the unique aspects of the hospital setting, it is worthwhile to install the infrastructure necessary for quality virtual consultations. Now is a great time for hospitals to explore the various technological solutions for telehealth, something that could provide a long-term benefit. This should also be considered a way to allow for the early discharge of patients to free up beds for COVID-19 patients.
When virtual consultations are impossible, all patients, staff, and visitors should be screened for symptoms and a high temperature at specific entry points to outpatient and inpatient facilities. For those patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy, infusion chairs need to be separated by 2 meters.
The most difficult decision to make is when to delay care in order to keep patients at home. Below are a few key guidelines:
A tragic outcome of the new stress that the COVID-19 pandemic has placed on the medical system is that an already limited number of resources must now be stretched across a wider population. Some medical systems must confront the fact that they may not be able to provide sufficient care for all their patients and attempts to do so will cause more harm. Hospitals must now have discussions about when and whether to discuss with cancer patients who are COVID-19 infected about end-of-life and palliative care. Ignoring this subject will lead to difficult and harmful results when the decisions need to be made.
We must accept that COVID-19 is a severe infection and that cancer patients are at high risk. Stringent and dedicated interventions are necessary, as this represents a major healthcare challenge for humanity. It is upon the oncological community to work together to develop the best possible operating procedures to maximize patient outcomes and reduce risk.
Investigational FGFR3-Selective Inhibitor Shows Promise in Urothelial Cancer
October 28th 2024TYRA-300 showed promising safety and preliminary antitumor activity in FGFR3-altered metastatic urothelial cancer, with a 54.5% partial response rate and 100% disease control in the SURF301 trial.
Read More