An expert in breast oncology shares her thoughts on the importance of the AMEERA-5 findings to the evolving treatment landscape for HR+ breast cancer.
Sara Hurvitz, MD: The AMEERA-5 clinical trial is an ongoing prospective, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double placebo-controlled clinical trial , which is phase 3, that is comparing the efficacy and safety of the amcenestrant plus palbociclib compared to letrozole plus palbociclib in patients who have advanced or locally recurrent unresectable metastatic breast cancer that’s ER positive [estrogen receptor]- and HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2] -negative. The study is enrolling patients who have not received prior therapy for metastatic disease. Patients who are excluded include those who’ve received another SERD [selective estrogen receptor down-regulator] for the treatment of early-stage disease or disease recurrence on or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients who are eligible are randomly assigned 1:1 to each of the treatment arms, and the treatment cycles are 28 days each. The stratification criteria for randomization include de novo metastatic disease, yes or no, menopausal status, pre or postmenopausal, as well as visceral metastases.
The planned enrollment for this clinical trial is nearly 1100 patients. This study is going to be open widely internationally at over 350 sites in over 30 countries. It’s a large study with ongoing accrual occurring now. The endpoints. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The secondary end point is overall survival. And there are a number of other more exploratory endpoints including objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, quality of life metrics, pharmacokinetics, safety, time to chemotherapy, and [progression-free survival].
If AMEERA-5 shows a clinically meaningful and significant improvement in progression-free survival associated with amcenestrant compared to letrozole in the frontline setting, it may end up becoming a new standard of care for the frontline treatment of ER-positive advanced breast cancer. These data would be exciting because it would provide rationale for the use of an oral SERD. Currently we only have an IM SERD [intramuscular selective estrogen receptor down-regulator] available to use in patients with ER-positive metastatic disease. If these results are promising as well, it would pave the way for other clinical trials potentially in earlier line settings, such as the adjuvant clinical trial setting, and/or in combination with other targeted therapies, including other CDK4/6 [cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6] inhibitors, potentially PI3 kinase pathway inhibitors among others.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Therapy Type and Site of Metastases Factor into HR+, HER2+ mBC Treatment
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ian Krop, MD, and participants discussed considerations affecting first- and second-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Imlunestrant Improves PFS in ESR1-Mutant Advanced Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024The phase 3 EMBER-3 trial showed imlunestrant improved PFS over SOC endocrine therapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with ESR1 mutations, though not significantly in the overall population.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen
Postoperative Radiation Improves HRQOL Over Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024In the phase 3 EUROPA trial, exclusive postoperative radiation therapy led to better health-related quality of life and fewer treatment-related adverse events in older patients with stage I luminal-like breast cancer at 24 months.
Read More