In locally advanced cervical cancer, the combination of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was demonstrated to be safe with encouraging antitumor activity.
In locally advanced cervical cancer, the combination of neoadjuvant tislelizumab (Tevimbra) plus chemotherapy was demonstrated to be safe with encouraging antitumor activity based on a pathologic complete response (pCR) in 60.9% and an optimal pathologic response (OPR) in 73.9% of patients, according to findings of a phase 2 single arm trial (NATIC; ChiCTR2200065392) presented by Jindong Sheng, MD, during the Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer.1
“In addition, other pathologic responses after treatment included a major pathologic response of 13% and a non-OPR rate of 26.1%,” Sheng, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China, said.
A total of 26 patients were enrolled for the trial and 23 patients completed neoadjuvant therapy. Investigators reported an objective response rate (ORR) of 87.0%, which was comprised of a complete response rate of 56.5%, a partial response rate of 30.5%, and stable disease (13.0%).
To be eligible for the trial, patients had to have Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique (FIGO) stage IB3, IIA2 with locally advanced cervical cancer, local tumor size of 4 cm or greater, no prior exposure to systemic antitumor therapy, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were stratified by PD-L1 expression (negative vs positive), histologic type at diagnosis, and FIGO stage.
Currently, the optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma is undetermined but previous studies suggest that immunotherapy has promising benefits.2
Patients received 200 mg of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by radical surgery. If patients had progressive disease they received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and left the study. The primary end point was pCR and secondary end points were ORR and adverse events.
At baseline, patients (n = 23) were a median age of 49.5 years (range, 28-65) and the majority (52.2%) had tumor size between 4.0 to 4.5 cm. Twenty-one (91.3%) patients had squamous carcinoma and 2 had adenocarcinoma (8.7%). For PD-L1 status, the majority of patients had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 50 or greater (43.5%), CPS between 1 and 9 (21.7%), between 10 and 49 (17.4%), and under 1 (4.3%). PD-L1 status was not determined in 13.0% of patients. Nearly 61% (60.9%) of patients were FIGO stage IIA2 and 39.1% were FIGO stage IB3.
When reviewing pathologic features and outcomes, investigators noted that patients who had high-risk factors such as positive lymph nodes and margins or parametrial infiltration received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Those patients who exhibited 2 or more intermediate risk factors received adjuvant radiotherapy whereas non-OPR patients received 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Further, 52.2% of imaging responses were consistent with pathologic responses.
For patients who received postoperative adjuvant treatment (n = 23), 8.7% of patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, respectively, and 73.9% received no postoperative therapy. At the data cut off of December 31, 2023, the median follow-up was 5.8 months (interquartile range, 1.5-9.4). One patient had disease recurrence and 22 patients are still being followed, Sheng said.
Regarding safety, 20 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with most described as low-grade, hematological in nature, and reversible. A total of 30% of patients experienced serious grade 3 TRAEs. No grade 4 TRAEs or grade 3 or greater immune-related AEs were reported, and no treatment discontinuations or deaths because of TRAEs were reported.
The most common grade 1/2 AEs experienced were lymphopenia (n = 20; 70%), anemia (65%), leukopenia (65%), neutropenia (55%), and hypoproteinemia (55%). Grade 3 AEs included lymphopenia (15%), and 5% each for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated alanine transaminase levels, respectively.
“These results will contribute to the advancement of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with radical surgery as a novel therapeutic strategy,” Sheng concluded.
Participants Discuss Frontline Immunotherapy Followed by ADC for Metastatic Cervical Cancer
December 19th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ramez N. Eskander, MD, and participants discussed first and second-line therapy decisions for a patient with PD-L1–positive cervical cancer in the frontline metastatic setting.
Read More
Imlunestrant Improves PFS in ESR1-Mutant Advanced Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024The phase 3 EMBER-3 trial showed imlunestrant improved PFS over SOC endocrine therapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with ESR1 mutations, though not significantly in the overall population.
Read More
ctDNA Detection Tied to Tumor Burden, Recurrence in HR+ Early Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024A phase 2 trial showed ctDNA detection in HR-positive early breast cancer was linked to larger tumors, higher residual cancer burden, and increased recurrence after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.
Read More
Postoperative Radiation Improves HRQOL Over Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024In the phase 3 EUROPA trial, exclusive postoperative radiation therapy led to better health-related quality of life and fewer treatment-related adverse events in older patients with stage I luminal-like breast cancer at 24 months.
Read More