Ellen T. Matloff, a certified genetic counselor and the president and CEO of MyGeneCounsel.com, gives advice to oncologists on navigating direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Ellen T. Matloff
Ellen T. Matloff
The Issue
It’s another busy clinic day and you are swamped. You walk into what should be a fairly routine consult, and that patient pulls out his iPad and shows you the result of his direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test results from 23andMe. He announces that he carries a mutation inMUTYH. He also downloaded his raw data, ran it through a third-party interpretation service, and has 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms that he would like to discuss with you. What do you do?
First, take a deep breath. Many have experienced this phenomenon, and soon we all will. Five years ago, you may have told this patient that DTC test results are not ‘real’ genetic test results, and that he should ignore them. But we now know that up to 60% of test results derived from raw data reads are accurate,1and that the accuracy is much higher for mutations that 23andMe has FDA clearance to return directly to consumers, which now includes the 3BRCA1/2variants common in those with Ashkenazi Jewish descent and the 2 common mutations inMUTYH. We, as health care providers, can no longer afford to ignore these test results, as they can yield meaningful results for the patient and his/her entire family.2
But it is difficult, if not impossible, for a busy oncologist to stay current on all of the DTC genetic testing offerings. Some DTC companies, like 23andMe, return a few health-related results that are likely to be correct, but must be repeated with a new DNA sample in a medical-grade laboratory before use in clinical care. And what test you choose to repeat can be complicated. For example, the NCCN recommendation for carriers of 1MUTYHmutation is to next sequence the entire gene,3in case the person has a second mutation, causingMUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP),a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome.
Other companies, including 23andMe and Ancestry.com, return raw data files at the consumer’s request that can be downloaded and interpreted by a third party like Promethease. These results definitely require verification with a new DNA sample in a medical-grade laboratory. A few DTC companies, like Color, are considered ‘medical grade,’ and those results likely do not require confirmation. However, the panels used by some of these companies do not include all of the genes that may be indicated, based on the patient’s personal or family history. Each of these result types has its own limitations and nuances, and requires different counseling. So how should an oncologist handle this ever-changing landscape of DTC genetic information?
First and foremost, do not ignore the result. You could be ignoring a test result that has true clinical meaning for your patient and his/her family.
Management Plan
Summary
More than 15 million consumers have now had DTC genetic testing and it is estimated that 100 million will have such testing by 2021.4Between DTC genetic testing, large population studies, and employer-initiated testing programs, the majority of our patients will come in to appointments with test results in hand within the next decade. Some of these test results will be inaccurate, and others will provide accurate insights into hereditary cancer risk, pharmacogenetics, and other information that will be critical in your management of the patient and the entire family. Oncologists will be critical in helping patients make sense of their genetic test results.
Ellen T. Matloff is a certified genetic counselor and the president and CEO of MyGeneCounsel.com, a company that provides digital genetic counseling and updates for consumers and health care providers.
References:
Navigating ESR1 Mutations in HR-Positive Breast Cancer With Dr Wander
October 31st 2024In this episode of Targeted Talks, Seth Wander, MD, PhD, discusses the clinical importance of ESR1 mutations in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer and how these mutations influence treatment approaches.
Listen
Addressing Informative Censoring Bias in Clinical Trials
November 7th 2024Oncology trials often celebrate treatments improving progression-free survival, yet toxicity-related censoring can bias results. Emphasizing overall survival and quality of life offers clearer insights into true clinical benefit.
Read More