Ruth O’Regan, MD:Overall, I think patients with early HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2]positive breast cancer are really doing very well with the regimens that we have right now. The preoperative approach is very attractive because you have this surrogate marker of outcome with the response to the preoperative treatment. And the question, I think, for HER2-positive breast cancer was really 2-fold. There are patients [who] don’t get a pathologic complete response. What do you do with those patients? Obviously, they have cancers that may be somewhat resistant.
We now have very exciting results from the KATHERINE study showing that trastuzumab DM1 [emtansine] can markedly improve outcome for those patients. But even with that, there may be patients [who] still have recurrences. And there are a number of new agents coming down the pipeline. Most of them are antibody-based immunotherapy-based regimens that I think will be very exciting going forward. They’re all being [evaluated] in the metastatic setting, but they may end up being translated into the early-stage setting for selected patients, I think.
One of the other big questions for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer is, can we further de-escalate therapy for patients? So we already know for patients with stage I breast cancer that’s HER2-positive that you can treat them with the APT [adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab] regimen, which is essentially 12 weeks of paclitaxel with trastuzumab. The bigger question is, are there a group of patients who maybe don’t need chemotherapy at all? And the most likely candidates would be patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptorpositive breast cancer where potentially we may be able to omit chemotherapy and just give them endocrine therapy with HER2-directed therapy.
The trials that have looked at this previously, mainly in the preoperative setting, haven’t shown definitively a group of patients [for whom] we can omit chemotherapy, but I do think this is a very important research question going over.
As we talked about earlier, there is a subset of these hormone receptorpositive, HER2-positive breast cancers that are actually luminal A cancers. And if we could delineate which patients have those cancers, they may be better treated with endocrine therapy and HER2-directed therapy versus chemotherapy, because there is substantial cross talk between the ER [estrogen receptor] and HER2 pathways, [and] it may be more important to block those pathways rather than give chemotherapy.
But currently there really is no group of patients right now [whom] we would omit chemotherapy from, apart from patients who have very small HER2-positive cancers. So T1a cancers, for example. [For] most of those patients we generally do not give chemotherapy in HER2-positive, HER2-directed therapies. But there may be other groups of patients where we can omit chemotherapy as well.
I think [there are] very important research questions that we’ll evaluate going forward.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Case: A 52-Year-Old Woman withHER2+ Breast Cancer
H & P
Imaging
Biopsy and labs:
Treatment
HER2-Low and -Ultralow Populations Benefit from T-DXd in HR+ mBC
November 13th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Aditya Bardia, MD, MS, FASCO, discussed data from the DESTINY-Breast04 and DESTINY-Breast06 trials for HER2-low breast cancer in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Breast Cancer Leans into the Decade of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Experts Discuss
September 25th 2020In season 1, episode 3 of Targeted Talks, the importance of precision medicine in breast cancer, and how that vitally differs in community oncology compared with academic settings, is the topic of discussion.
Listen