Francis P. Worden, MD, reviews the progression-free survival data and safety findings from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 study which evaluated treatment with cabozantinib in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.
Francis P. Worden, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, reviews the progression-free survival (PFS) data and safety findings from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 study (NCT03690388) which evaluated treatment with cabozantinib (Cabometyx) in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC).
In the study, patients aged 16 years and older with RAIR-DTC were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral cabozantinib tablets at a dose of 60 mg/day or a placebo. Investigators evaluated the primary end points of objective response rate and PFS in the intent-to-treat population, according to RECIST v1.1 by blinded, independent review.
According to safety findings, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were seen in 62% of patients given cabozantinib compared with 28% given placebo. With cabozantinib vs placebo, the most common AEs observed were hypertension (12% v 2%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (10% v 0%), and fatigue (9% v 0%). There were no grade 5 treatment-related AEs observed in the study and no new safety signals.
Further, extended follow-up showed that patients treated with cabozantinib also had better efficacy results vs patients treated with placebo. Overall, the findings from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 study support treatment with cabozantinib for this patient population.
Transcription:
0:10 | If we look at the data, the median progression-free survival with prior lenvatinib was 5.8 months vs 16.6 months with sorafenib. But overall, again, we see the total improvement when the 2 drugs are combined together.
0:30 | Tolerability is similar to what we see with the other multi-targeted kinase inhibitors. Hypertension and hand-foot syndrome can be an issue, as we know with cabozantinib, as well as general fatigue. Overall, for second-line therapy, patients did quite well with this agent, and it should be considered once people fail first-line therapy with lenvatinib.
Anticipating Novel Options for the RAI-Refractory DTC Armamentarium
May 15th 2023In season 4, episode 6 of Targeted Talks, Warren Swegal, MD, takes a multidisciplinary look at the RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer treatment landscape, including the research behind 2 promising systemic therapy options.
Listen
No Improvement With Durvalumab vs Cetuximab in Advanced HNSCC
January 9th 2025The NRG-HN004 trial showed that durvalumab did not improve outcomes vs cetuximab in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy with contraindications to cisplatin, leading to early trial closure.
Read More