A phase 3 clinical trial studying favezelimab in combination with pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with previously treated PD–L1-positive metastatic colorectal cancer failed to meet its primary end point of overall survival.
The phase 3 KEYFORM-007 study (NCT05064059) evaluating the anti–LAG-3 antibody favezelimab in combination with the anti–PD-1 therapy pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with previously treated PD–L1-positive microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) did not meet its primary end point of overall survival (OS).1
“Metastatic colorectal cancer continues to be a challenging disease to treat, especially for the majority of patients who have microsatellite stable disease, which has had limited response to immunotherapies,” said M. Catherine Pietanza, MD, vice president, global clinical development, Merck Research Laboratories, in a press release. “We are grateful to the patients and investigators for their participation in this study, and we will continue to advance our clinical development program to evaluate [pembrolizumab]-based combinations and novel candidates for patients with colorectal cancer in need of new options.”
A full analysis of the data is ongoing and will be shared with the scientific community.
In June 2020, the FDA approved pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient CRC.2
The fixed-dose combination of favezelimab and pembrolizumab is also being investigated in the KEYFORM-008 study (NCT05508867) for the treatment of patients with PD–(L)1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.1
The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYFORM-007 study enrolled 441 patients with PD–L1-positive, MSS, mCRC who previously received standard therapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the fixed-dose combination of 800 mg favezelimab and 200 mg pembrolizumab on day 1 of a 3-week cycle for 35 cycles or investigator’s choice of regorafenib (Stivarga) or trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf; TAS-102).
Along with the primary end point of OS, secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, incidence of adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, and change from baseline in quality of life.3
Patients were eligible for enrollment in the study if they had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and adequate organ function. Those with active central nervous system metastases, clinically significant cardiovascular disease, a known additional malignancy, active autoimmune disease, or a history of HIV infection were not eligible for study participation.
Ilson Examines Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancers
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, David H. Ilson, MD, PhD, discussed the outcomes of the CheckMate 649, CheckMate 648, and KEYNOTE-859 trials of chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with upper GI cancers.
Read More
Tumor Treating Fields Show Significant Survival Benefit in Pancreatic Cancer
December 2nd 2024The PANOVA-3 trial demonstrated a significant 2-month overall survival improvement when adding tumor treating fields to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Read More