Therapies in the adjuvant setting like trastuzumab (Herceptin) and neratinib have shown more durable responses in patients with HER2+ breast cancer, as opposed to long-term treatment, said Mohammad Jahanzeb, MD.
HER2+ Breast Cancer Treatment
Mohammad Jahanzeb, MD
Therapies in the adjuvant setting like trastuzumab (Herceptin) and neratinib have shown more durable responses in patients with HER2+ breast cancer, as opposed to long-term treatment, said Mohammad Jahanzeb, MD, in an interview withTargeted Oncology.
"It is wonderful to have trastuzumab in the adjuvant space, which is the current standard treatment. It is standard of care to administer 12 months of trastuzumab-based therapy in addition to chemotherapy, ideally concurrently," said Jahanzeb, medical director, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Deerfield Beach.
"However, we still have upwards room because we do not cure everybody. Therefore, there have been several attempts made to improve the cure rate of HER2-positive breast cancer by adding things to trastuzumab, or extending its duration. We found that giving patients trastuzumab for 2 years instead of 1 does not matter. There is no additional benefit to extend the duration."
Data from the phase III ExteNET study showed patients with early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer who were treated with neratinib immediately following adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a 33% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence.1 In a 2-year analysis, it was shown that the invasive disease-free survival was 93.9% in the neratinib arm versus 91.6% in the placebo arm (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91;P= .009).
"[The trial] was a placebo-controlled trial that, so far, has shown a 2% absolute benefit at the 2-year mark. In the hormone receptorpositive population, there was a 4% absolute benefit. There was an unplanned analysis, and if you looked at those patients who had centrally confirmed HER2-positivity by FISH and with hormone receptor positivity, their benefit was actually 9%," said Jahanzeb.
"The main problem was diarrhea. In the 95.4% who experienced the toxicity, 39.9% were grade 3/4 diarrhea, which can be managed by tapering down from 16 mg in the first month to 6 mg. Grade 3/4 diarrhea does not need to occur in nearly 40% of patients."
Trastuzumab also shows efficacy in the adjuvant setting. In a meta-analysis of data from the HERA, N9831, NSABP-B31, PACS-04, and FinHER trials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology,2patients with HER2-positive breast cancer that was ≤2 cm experienced an improvement in disease-free and overall survival (OS) when treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.
In these trials, the 8-year disease-free survival was improved by 9.4% for patients with HER2-positive and HR-negative tumors ≤2 cm treated with trastuzumab compared with those who did not receive HER2 inhibition (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88;P<.001). Also, OS at 8 years was increased by 8.8% with trastuzumab versus without (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47-0.74;P<.001).
Jahanzeb also touches on current standard of care methods, saying oncologists should question what the "norm" is and possibly step into other therapies for their patients.
"Historically, when we look at things we don’t question anymore after they become standard of care, such as use of taxanes after anthracyclines in node-positive patients, the benefit, in terms of survival benefit, has been 3% to 5% by those maneuvers," said Jahanzeb. "It does not hit double digits. If you look at some of the pivotal trastuzumab-based trials, the benefit, in terms of lives saved or additional patients cured at the end of a 10-year follow-up, is 4% to 9%. Single-digit survival improvement has been the ballpark, and neratinib falls right into that ballpark."
Looking toward the future of treatments for HER2+ breast cancer, Jahanzeb says the neoadjuvant setting is where studies should be digging for answers.
"Relapses are fewer and fewer, now that our therapies are more effective, and it takes a very long time to get to the event number, and you need to have lots of events to detect small differences," he said. "Perhaps, the neoadjuvant setting is where we ought to be testing more things to get those treatments to patients faster. The prime example with this is pertuzumab being proven effective in the neoadjuvant setting. Now, an expert panel is endorsing it for use in the adjuvant setting."
Therapy Type and Site of Metastases Factor into HR+, HER2+ mBC Treatment
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ian Krop, MD, and participants discussed considerations affecting first- and second-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Imlunestrant Improves PFS in ESR1-Mutant Advanced Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024The phase 3 EMBER-3 trial showed imlunestrant improved PFS over SOC endocrine therapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with ESR1 mutations, though not significantly in the overall population.
Read More
ctDNA Detection Tied to Tumor Burden, Recurrence in HR+ Early Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024A phase 2 trial showed ctDNA detection in HR-positive early breast cancer was linked to larger tumors, higher residual cancer burden, and increased recurrence after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.
Read More