"Since submitting the BLA for margetuximab, we have worked collaboratively with the FDA to answer the Agency’s questions as they arise. We will continue to work closely with the Agency to potentially bring margetuximab as a treatment option to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer."
The FDA has announced that they will no longer hold an Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) meeting to discuss the Biologics License Application (BLA) for margetuximab (MGAH22) in combination with chemotherapy as a potential treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the FDA still plans to meet the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) date of December 18, 2020, for the application review.1
"Since submitting the BLA for margetuximab, we have worked collaboratively with the FDA to answer the Agency’s questions as they arise," said Scott Koenig, MD, president, and chief executive officer of MacroGenics, in a statement. "We will continue to work closely with the Agency to potentially bring margetuximab as a treatment option to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer."
The BLA was submitted to the FDA in December 2019 based on data from the phase III SOPHIA clinical trial. In this study, margetuximab plus chemotherapy was compared with trastuzumab (Herceptin) with chemotherapy to determine the efficacy of the study drug in this patient population.
According to the data presented at the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), the median overall survival (OS) was 26.1 months with margetuximab in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group (95% CI, 18.86-24.05) versus 19.8 months (95% CI, 17.54-22.28) in the trastuzumab arm (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P=.326).2
Investigators also noted a significant improvement in the overall response rate (ORR) with the margetuximab combination compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. The median ORR was 25.2% with margetuximab versus 13.7% with trastuzumab (P =.0006). There was also an improvement in the clinical benefit rate, which was 48.1% with margetuximab versus 35.6% in the trastuzumab group (P =.0025).
In the margetuximab arm, the complete response (CR) rate was 1.9%, and the partial response (PR) rate was 23.3%. Additionally, there was a 53.8% incidences of stable disease (SD), and 15% of patients had progressive disease (PD). In the trastuzumab arm, the CR rate was 1.5%, the PR rate was 12.2%, the SD rate of 58.5%, and a PD rate of 21.1%. Overall, the median duration of response in the margetuximab was 6.9 months versus 7.0 months with trastuzumab.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the margetuximab arm was 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.22-6.97) compared with 4.4 months in the trastuzumab arm (95% CI, 4.14-5.45), as assessed by the study investigators (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P =.0006). The risk of disease progression or death overall was 29%.
Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 142 patients on the margetuximab arm (53.8%) compared with 140 patients on the trastuzumab arm (52.6%). Serious AEs occurred in 43 patients on the margetuximab arm (16.3%) compared with 49 patients on the trastuzumab arm (18.4%). Infusion-related reactions were more common with margetuximab than with trastuzumab (13% vs 3%), which were mostly grade 1/2 and associated with the first cycle. There were 4 grade 4 infusion-related reactions in the margetuximab arm versus none in the trastuzumab arm.
The co-primary end points of the study included PFS, OS, and incidence of grade 3 or greater infusion-related reactions. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed PFS, ORR, and the incidence of all-grade infusion-related reactions.
Margetuximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, which is expressed by tumor cells in the breast, gastroesophageal, and other solid tumors. The agent was designed to block HER2 and has demonstrated similar HER2 binding and antiproliferative effects as trastuzumab. HER2 expression is present in about 15% to 20% of breast cancer cases, and targeted therapies, such as margetuximab, appear to improve outcomes in this patient population.
References
Therapy Type and Site of Metastases Factor into HR+, HER2+ mBC Treatment
December 20th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ian Krop, MD, and participants discussed considerations affecting first- and second-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Real-World Data and AI Help Improve ILD Management in HER2+ Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024Project EVOLVE findings show how AI-driven real-world data analysis, combined with targeted educational interventions, can enhance adverse event monitoring and improve patient outcomes for those with HER2+ breast cancer.
Read More
FDA Grants Clearance for Phase 1 Trial of BL-M17D1 in Solid Tumors
November 11th 2024Following the clearance of an investigational new drug application from the FDA, a phase 1 trial will examine the novel antibody-drug conjugate BL-M17D1 in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Read More
Study Reveals Encouraging Results in HER2+ Breast Cancer With Brain Mets
November 1st 2024Barbara O’Brien, MD, discussed findings and implications from the phase 2 TBCRC049 study evaluating the combination of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine in HER2-positive breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis.
Read More