External beam radiation therapy with or without short-term androgen deprivation showed 15-year survival benefits for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
3D rendering of prostate cancer
A study presented at the 2025 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium found that external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), with or without short-term androgen deprivation (STAD), led to 15-year survival in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC).1
Data from the trial revealed that at a median follow-up of 12.0 years and a maximum of 19.8 years, the 15-year prostate cancer–specific survival (PCSS) rate was 91% for patients with IRPC undergoing STAD plus EBRT and those receiving EBRT alone (P = .67). Additionally, the 15-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% for those undergoing STAD plus EBRT and 51% for those undergoing EBRT alone (P = .82).
Additionally, the metastasis-free survival (MFS) rate after 15 years was 85% vs 83% in the STAD/EBRT and EBRT arms, respectively (P = .59). Furthermore, the 15-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) rates were 52% and 49% in each respective arm (P = .41).
“After 15 years of follow-up, [patients with] IRPC treated with STAD [for 6 months with or without] EBRT [at] 73.8 Gy experienced a PCSS [rate] of 91%, despite a high prostate-specific antigen [PSA] failure rate of 49% to 52%,” Barry W. Goy, MD, radiation oncologist at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, wrote in the poster.1 “It is unclear if 6 months of STAD in addition to EBRT can improve PCSS or OS for IRPC, or just merely delay PSA progression.”
Patients with IRPC (n = 566) were enrolled and treated from 2004 to 2007 with EBRT at a median dose of 7380/180cGY to the 98% prostate isodose. Of those patients, 336 were given leuprolide for a median duration of 6 months, and the remaining 230 were treated with EBRT alone. FFBF was defined by a PSA nadir greater than 2.0 ng/ml.
Additional data from the study showed that the 10-year PCSS rate was 96% in patients who underwent STAD plus EBRT vs 98% in those who underwent EBRT alone at a dose of 73.8 Gy after a median follow-up of 12.0 years (P = .34). Comparatively, a previous study published in JAMA, which enrolled 206 patients with localized, unfavorable-risk prostate cancer, showed an approximately 94% 10-year PCSS rate with STAD plus EBRT vs approximately 81% with EBRT alone (P = .02).2 Patients on trial received 70 Gy of EBRT for a median follow-up of 7.6 years.
Furthermore, in a separate trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which enrolled and assigned 1979 patients with stage T1b, T1c, T2a, and T2b prostate adenocarcinoma and a PSA level of 20 ng/ml to receive either EBRT alone (n = 992) or EBRT with STAD for 4 months (n = 987).3 At an EBRT dose of 66.6 Gy and a median follow-up of 9.1 years, the 10-year PCSS rates were approximately 97% in the EBRT plus STAD arm and approximately 89% in the EBRT alone arm (P = .001).
Multivariate analysis revealed that adverse factors were greater in the STAD group than those who underwent EBRT alone. Notable clinical factors included clinical stage (P = .02), inactive PSA (P <.01), and Gleason group (P = .02).
Additionally, a previous study presented by Goy at the 2018 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium showed that of 574 patients who underwent EBRT at a median dose of 75.3 Gy, the 10-year FFBF rate was 58.8% (P < .0001).4 This matched the 10-year FFBF rate for those undergoing radical prostatectomy (n = 819; 58.8%), and was numerically lower than those undergoing brachytherapy (n = 110; 82.0%).
References