Melhem Solh, MD, discusses how the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with the tumor protein 53 gene mutation has changed over the past decade.
Melhem Solh, MD, Northside Hospital, discusses how the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the tumor protein 53 (TP53) gene mutation has changed over the past decade.
Research done by the Blood Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital examined the outcomes of patients with AML and MDS who have a TP53 gene mutation as well as the post-transplant outcomes of those patients as they tend to have very poor outcomes.
According to Solh, this patient population has been challenging as they have responded poorly to chemotherapy and often relapse quickly.
Transcription:
0:08 | This has been a very challenging population of patients because we know they've done poorly with chemotherapy. They tend to be refracted or have very quick relapses. If a patient has TP53 deletion 17 AML, they are not eligible for transplant for 1 reason or the other, and they are not going to do well. Even with transplant, they still don't do too well compared to other subtypes of AML. The question is, using the drugs we have available now to put them in a deeper remission before transplant, would that translate into a better outcome?
0:47 | Now, unfortunately, we didn't have the amount of deep data on those patients and our analysis because some of them go back 6 or 7 years ago, before we're able to collect that type of data. That would be one question to answer. Do you really need to get as deep of a response to help improve, and would the transplant matter at that point in this specific subgroup? We know it matters in general to get somebody MRD negative.
1:13 | The other thing, using post-transplant maintenance, there's a tendency to try to put patients on a hypomethylating agent. There are studies going on to do a hypometh plus venetoclax [Venclexta] for high-risk patients, which I'd imagine this group would fall into. The answer for would make a difference in their outcomes is that we have to wait for the study to decide.
FDA Approves Remestemcel-L in Pediatric Patients With Acute GVHD
December 18th 2024Following a complete response letter and biologics license application resubmission, the FDA has approved remestemcel-L for the treatment of pediatric patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease.
Read More
Imlunestrant Improves PFS in ESR1-Mutant Advanced Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024The phase 3 EMBER-3 trial showed imlunestrant improved PFS over SOC endocrine therapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with ESR1 mutations, though not significantly in the overall population.
Read More
ctDNA Detection Tied to Tumor Burden, Recurrence in HR+ Early Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024A phase 2 trial showed ctDNA detection in HR-positive early breast cancer was linked to larger tumors, higher residual cancer burden, and increased recurrence after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.
Read More
Postoperative Radiation Improves HRQOL Over Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer
December 13th 2024In the phase 3 EUROPA trial, exclusive postoperative radiation therapy led to better health-related quality of life and fewer treatment-related adverse events in older patients with stage I luminal-like breast cancer at 24 months.
Read More