In the first article of a 2-part series, Joshua Richter, MD, discussed how the triplet therapy of isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone, has impacted treatment considerations for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.
CASE
A 60-year-old White woman was diagnosed with stage III multiple myeloma.
Laboratory values:
Treatment
Two years on lenalidomide maintenance
The patient was then started on isatuximab (Sarclisa), carfilzomib (Kyprolis), and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) and achieved a very good partial response (VGPR).
Targeted Oncology: What were the results with Isa-Kd in select subgroups of patients on the IKEMA trial (NCT03275285), and how does this compare to other agents?
JOSHUA RICHTER, MD: For the most part, everything...favored the triplet therapy.1 There's a couple [groups] that overlap a bit, but some that overlap even more. [For example], high risk does overlap but 1q gain does not...and the reason why some of these [groups have a better response] is in part because [you have to think about] what the heavy lifter is in a regimen, and what drugs within the regimen have an impact on risk.
If you look at the immunomodulatory imide-containing regimens, the lenalidomide-based regimens, even the pomalidomide [Pomalyst]-based regimens, they don't have the biggest impact on high risk [patients]. Proteasome inhibitors [PIs] do have an [impact though], so does bortezomib and carfilzomib, but it doesn't do the whole job as it doesn't get rid of disease completely…. So if you're already going beyond some PIs, or if you already have a PI regimen as your backbone, the bar is higher to overcome. If you look at the...regimens that include lenalidomide vs those with the CD38 drugs, it has a huge impact on patients with high risk, because lenalidomide has no impact on high risk.2
What was the depth of patients’ response at the 3-year follow up of the IKEMA trial?
At the end of the day, depth is very meaningful. If you look at the overall response rates [ORRs], there isn't a huge difference.3 But depth matters because we know the deeper response [the patient] gets correlates to the durability [of the response]. The difference in the ORR [between Isa-Kd and Kd alone] was 86.6% vs 83.7%, respectively.3 We're not talking about ORRs that are much different, because in early relapse [the patient is] going to do well; the problem is their numbers have come down, but they're going to come right back up. [The patient] is going to respond, which is wonderful, but what's important is how long is that going to stay there? How long till you have to reach in your back pocket for the next [treatment] option?
In terms of the ORR, not much is different, but with the VGPR, stringent complete response, and MRD, this is where there are bigger differences.3 [This is] because for the patients who got Kd had a partial remission and will sit there for a year or so [then their numbers will] come back up, but the same person who got that response [in the Isa-Kd] arm went much lower and stayed there for much longer, and that's where we see the difference [in these 2 arms].
What were the survival outcomes at the times of the 3-year follow up?
In the analysis of the intention-to-treat population, [the median progression-free survival (PFS)] was 19.2 months [95% CI, 15.8-25.0] for patients on Kd alone—19 months in the early relapse setting is not bad; it's pretty good.3 [However, the median PFS with Isa-Kd] was 35.7 months [95% CI, 25.8-44.0], and that's a big separation which occurs between both arms [HR, 0.58; 95.4% CI, 0.42-0.79].3 One of the things that CD38-based therapies have brought us is that a lot of our patients with myeloma are older and adding classical chemotherapy, and going from doublets to triplets, or triplets to quadruplets used to be a big ask, [but not with Isa-Kd now].
References
1. Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, et al; IKEMA study group. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10292):2361-2371. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00592-4
2. Bumma N, Dhakal B, Fraser R, et al. Impact of bortezomib-based versus lenalidomide maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2023;129(14):2179-2191. doi:10.1002/cncr.34778
3. Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results from IKEMA, a randomized Phase 3 study. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13(1):72. doi:10.1038/s41408-023-00797-8
Retrospective Data Highlight Impact of Dose Escalation of Regorafenib in mCRC
May 9th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Madappa Kundranda, MD, PhD, discussed recent retrospective studies that looked at outcomes of dose optimization of regorafenib for patients with relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Key Takeaways From QOL and Use of Steroids With IO-Based RCC Regimens
May 6th 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ulka Vaishampayan, MBBS, discussed the safety and quality-of-life data for ipilimumab plus nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More
NGS and ctDNA Considered in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression
May 3rd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Ruth M. O'Regan, MD, led a discussion on whether to order next-generation sequencing and/or circulating tumor DNA testing for a patient with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer after progression in the first article of a 2-part series.
Read More
Comparing Choices for IO/TKI Combinations in Advanced RCC
May 2nd 2024During a Case-Based Roundtable® event, Shilpa Gupta, MD, led a discussion on the combination of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the second article of a 2-part series.
Read More