Justin M. Watts, MD, discusses the key takeaway from the phase 2 Study P-2001 clinical trial, a randomized study comparing the safety and efficacy of pevonedistat in combination with azacitidine in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Justin M. Watts, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, discusses the key takeaway from the phase 2 Study P-2001 clinical trial (NCT02610777), a randomized study comparing the safety and efficacy of pevonedistat in combination with azacitidine compared with azacitidine alone in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
The 120-patient study provided fairly robust data with improved event-free survival (EFS) at 5 months, says Watts. There was also marked improvements in the complete remission rates and durations of response. Watts notes this is only 1 of the active agents under development in MDS at this time, which is a good problem to have.
The difference with pevonedistat and other active agents in development is the response rates are comparable, but these are randomized phase 2 data with an emerging EFS benefit that remains to be seen in the phase 3 study, where the primary end point is EFS. However, Watts notes this regimen is appealing due to its minimal toxicity, particularly when added to azacitidine.
Advancing Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2+ Breast Cancer Through ctDNA Monitoring
December 19th 2024In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Adrienne Waks, MD, provided insights into the significance of the findings from the DAPHNe trial and their clinical implications for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Read More